(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 5


Fig. 5. Scoring meiotic pairing and bouquet arrangement by FISH. (A-J) Two loci, one close (region B) and one at a larger distance (region A) from the telomeric end of the MIC (arrowheads), which is tapered and DAPI-pale (see Loidl and Scherthan, 2004), were delineated by FISH. Separate FISH signals (A-C,F-H) are scored as indicating the absence of pairing. Single FISH signals (D,E,J) and double dots (I) reflect pairing of the corresponding homologous loci. Examples are shown from wild type (A-F), the hop2A{Delta} mutant (G,I) and the spo11{Delta} mutant (H,J). (K-N) FISH with a compound telomere probe (orange) suggests that (some) telomeres are assembled near one end of stage-II MICs of the wild type (K) and the spo11{Delta} mutant (M). In the wild type, the telomere signal becomes very strong upon further elongation of the MIC (L), whereas in the spo11{Delta} mutant, only weak scattered signals remain visible, presumably indicating dispersal of the telomeres in stage-III-like MICs (N). The elongated MICs shown are relatively straight because the Carnoy fixation procedure releases nuclei from the cells, which improves FISH. Scale bar: 5 µm.