spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eshel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eshel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, K.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 100, Issue 1 213-218, Copyright © 1991 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Evidence for an inequality in the forces that generate principal and reverse bends in sperm flagella

D Eshel, C Shingyoji, K Yoshimura, IR Gibbons and K Takahashi
Pacific Biomedical Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822.

The response of the mechanism initiating flagellar bends to imposed mechanical transients has been studied by holding the head of a sea urchin sperm in the tip of a sinusoidally vibrating micropipet and then displacing the micropipet laterally at a speed of up to 1.15 micron ms-1 for 1.5 beat cycle, without vibration, before resuming sinusoidal vibration with the initial phase, frequency and amplitude at the new location of the pipet. This transient displacement of the micropipet delays the initiation of the bend that was due to initiate 0.5 beat cycle after onset of the displacement. The amount of this delay increases with the speed of the displacement, for speeds up to 1 micron ms-1. Analysis of the flagellar waveforms during the transient showed that with imposed displacements at speeds of equal magnitude, the initiation of a principal bend was delayed to a longer extent than that of a reverse bend. At a micropipet speed of 0.75 micron ms-1, there was an average delay of 0.21 beat cycle in the initiation time of a principal bend as compared to a delay of only about 0.04 beat cycle in the initiation time of a reverse bend during displacements in the opposite direction. For both principal and reverse bends, the second bend due to initiate during the transient displacement initiated in most of the cases with no delay, regardless of the micropipet speed. Our results suggest that the force generated by microtubule sliding to initiated a new reverse bend is greater than that generated to initiate a principal bend.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991