spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Underwood, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Underwood, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 104, Issue 3 793-803, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Effects of polystyrene surface chemistry on the biological activity of solid phase fibronectin and vitronectin, analysed with monoclonal antibodies

PA Underwood, JG Steele and BA Dalton
CSIRO Division of Biomolecular Engineering, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, NSW, Australia.

The conformation and biological activities of fibronectin (FN) and vitronectin (VN) coated on different plastic surfaces were investigated using cell adhesion and a panel of domain-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The adhesion of BHK fibroblasts was markedly better on FN coated on hydrophilic tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) than on hydrophobic, untreated polystyrene (PS). mAbs A17 and 3E3, which inhibit the binding of BHK cells to the RGD-containing sequence within the cell binding region of FN, also bound preferentially to FN on TCPS. In contrast, two anti-FN mAbs, which have no effect on cell adhesion (A35 and A3), bound preferentially to the conformation of FN on the more hydrophobic PS. Mouse melanoma cells utilise an additional cell-binding site in the Hep II domain of FN and their preference for FN coated on TCPS was less marked than that of BHK cells. This reduced preference was again mimicked by the binding of a mAb, A32, which inhibits the binding of B16 cells to the Hep II domain of FN. In contrast, BHK cell adhesion to VN did not display a preference for TCPS over PS. The cell-binding activity of adsorbed VN was matched by the binding of a cell adhesion-inhibitory mAb, A18, which, unlike mAbs A17 and A32, displayed slightly increased binding to VN coated on PS, rather than TCPS. When the denaturating effect of coating FN and VN to PS in the presence of urea was investigated, similar correlations between BHK cell adhesion and the binding of inhibitory mAbs were observed. Urea treatment of FN significantly reduced both BHK cell adhesion and the binding of both cell adhesion-inhibitory mAbs, whereas the binding of A35 and A3 was unaffected. There was no significant effect of urea treatment of VN upon either BHK cell adhesion or mAb binding. A larger panel of anti-FN mAbs was used, together with the anti-VN mAbs, to determine whether there were differences in mAb recognition of FN and VN adsorbed on three different brands of TCPS. The mAbs segregated into four reactivity patterns, of which A17, A32, A35 and A18 respectively were representative. Significant differences were observed in mAb recognition of FN and VN adsorbed to different brands of TCPS. These may reflect differences in the ability of these surfaces to support optimal growth of different cell types. The effect of divalent cations upon adsorbed FN and VN was also investigated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J.-S. Chia, C.-Y. Yeh, and J.-Y. Chen
Identification of a Fibronectin Binding Protein from Streptococcus mutans
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2000; 68(4): 1864 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. J. García, M. D. Vega, and D. Boettiger
Modulation of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation through Substrate-dependent Changes in Fibronectin Conformation
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 1999; 10(3): 785 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Garcia, F. Huber, and D. Boettiger
Force Required to Break alpha 5beta 1 Integrin-Fibronectin Bonds in Intact Adherent Cells Is Sensitive to Integrin Activation State
J. Biol. Chem., May 1, 1998; 273(18): 10988 - 10993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
L. Channavajjala, A Eidsath, and W. Saxinger
A simple method for measurement of cell-substrate attachment forces: application to HIV-1 Tat
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 1997; 110(2): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
B. Dalton, C. McFarland, P. Underwood, and J. Steele
Role of the heparin binding domain of fibronectin in attachment and spreading of human bone-derived cells
J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1995; 108(5): 2083 - 2092.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. J. Podor, S. G. Shaughnessy, M. N. Blackburn, and C. B. Peterson
New Insights into the Size and Stoichiometry of the Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type-1{middle dot}Vitronectin Complex
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25402 - 25410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1993