spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Propose a workshop for 2011 spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuge, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuge, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 107, Issue 1 299-312, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Unorthodox male meiosis in Trichosia pubescens (Sciaridae). Chromosome elimination involves polar organelle degeneration and monocentric spindles in first and second division

H Fuge
Department of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Federal Republic of Germany.

Male meiosis in Trichosia pubescens (Sciaridae) was investigated by means of serial section electron microscopy and immunofluorescence light microscopy. From earlier studies of another sciarid fly, Sciara coprophila (Phillips (1967) J. Cell. Biol. 33, 73-92), it is known that the spindle poles in sciarid spermatogonia are characterized by pairs of 'giant centrioles', ring-shaped organelles composed of large numbers of singlet microtubules. In the present study spermatocytes in early prophase of Trichosia were found to possess single giant centrioles at opposite sides of the nucleus. The obvious reduction in centriole number from the spermatogonial to the spermatocyte stage is suggested to be the result of a suppression of daughter centriole formation. In late prophase, a large aster is developed around the centriole at one pole. At the opposite pole no comparable aster is formed. Instead, a number of irregular centriolar components appear in this region, a process that is understood to be a degeneration of the polar organelle. The components of the degenerate pole migrate into a cytoplasmic protrusion ('bud'), which later is also utilized for the elimination of paternal chromosomes. The existence of only one functional polar centre is the reason for the formation of a monopolar monocentric spindle in first meiotic division, which in turn is one of the prerequisites for the elimination of paternal chromosomes. While the set of maternal and L chromosomes orientates and probably moves towards the pole, paternal chromosomes seem to be unable to contact the pole, possibly due to an inactivation of their kinetochores. Retrograde ('away from the pole') chromosome motion not involving kinetochores is assumed. Eventually, paternal chromosomes move into the pole-distal bud and are eliminated by casting off, together with the components of the degenerate polar organelle. Chromosome elimination can be delayed until the second meiotic division. The spindle of the second meiotic division is bipolar and monocentric. One spindle pole is marked by the polar centre of first division. The opposite spindle apex is devoid of a polar centre. It is assumed that spindle bipolarity in the second division is induced by the amphi-orientated chromosomes themselves. The maternal and L chromosome set (except the non-disjunctional X chromosome, which is found near the polar centre) congress in a metaphase plate, divide and segregate. Of the two daughter nuclei resulting from the second meiotic division, the one containing the X chromatids is retained as the nucleus of the future spermatozoon. The other nucleus becomes again eliminated within a second cytoplasmic bud.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. Rutkowska and A. V Badyaev
Meiotic drive and sex determination: molecular and cytological mechanisms of sex ratio adjustment in birds
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2008; 363(1497): 1675 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
F. Pardo-Manuel de Villena and C. Sapienza
Female Meiosis Drives Karyotypic Evolution in Mammals
Genetics, November 1, 2001; 159(3): 1179 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
Z.-h. Yang, G. I. Gallicano, Q.-C. Yu, and E. Fuchs
An Unexpected Localization of Basonuclin in the Centrosome, Mitochondria, and Acrosome of Developing Spermatids
J. Cell Biol., May 5, 1997; 137(3): 657 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Esteban, M. Campos, A. Perondini, and C Goday
Role of microtubules and microtubule organizing centers on meiotic chromosome elimination in Sciara ocellaris
J. Cell Sci., January 3, 1997; 110(6): 721 - 730.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994