|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 107, Issue 3 673-682, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
G Callaini, MG Riparbelli and R Dallai
Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Siena, Italy.
Maternally inherited cytoplasmic bacteria have occasionally been observed in embryos and adults of different strains of several Drosophila species. While there is a considerable body of data on the relationship between bacteria and embryo viability, little is known about the behavior of these bacteria during the early development of Drosophila. In eggs laid by infected Drosophila melanogaster females we showed that cytoplasmic bacteria were initially concentrated in a thin cortical layer and scattered in the yolk region. During the following syncytial blastoderm mitoses the bacteria mainly accumulated towards the poles of the mitotic spindles, suggesting that astral microtubules play a role in localizing bacteria. This is supported by the observation that treatment of the infected embryos with the microtubule-disrupting drug colchicine led to the partial dissociation of the bacteria from the spindle poles, whereas cytochalasin treatment left almost all the bacterial clusters intact. Moreover, bacteria were not found near the polar bodies and yolk nuclei, which were without astral microtubules. In mitosis-defective embryos, with centrosomes dissociated from the nuclei, the bacteria were concentrated in association with the isolated astral microtubules, and in cold-treated embryos, in which microtubules regrew from isolated centrosomes after recovering, the bacteria clustered around the newly formed asters. These observations, also supported by electron microscope analysis, indicate a close relationship between cytoplasmic bacteria and astral microtubules, and suggest that the latter were able to build discrete cytoplasmic domains ensuring the proper distribution of cytoplasmic components during the blastoderm mitoses, despite the lack of cell membranes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Albertson, C. Casper-Lindley, J. Cao, U. Tram, and W. Sullivan Symmetric and asymmetric mitotic segregation patterns influence Wolbachia distribution in host somatic tissue J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2009; 122(24): 4570 - 4583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Perez-Mongiovi, N. Malmanche, H. Bousbaa, and C. Sunkel Maternal expression of the checkpoint protein BubR1 is required for synchrony of syncytial nuclear divisions and polar body arrest in Drosophila melanogaster Development, October 15, 2005; 132(20): 4509 - 4520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Veneti, M. E. Clark, T. L. Karr, C. Savakis, and K. Bourtzis Heads or Tails: Host-Parasite Interactions in the Drosophila-Wolbachia System Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 70(9): 5366 - 5372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Tram and W. Sullivan Role of Delayed Nuclear Envelope Breakdown and Mitosis in Wolbachia-Induced Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Science, May 10, 2002; 296(5570): 1124 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. D. Hurst, A. P. Johnson, J. H. G. v. d. Schulenburg, and Y. Fuyama Male-Killing Wolbachia in Drosophila: A Temperature-Sensitive Trait With a Threshold Bacterial Density Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 699 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. McCartney, H. A. Dierick, C. Kirkpatrick, M. M. Moline, A. Baas, M. Peifer, and A. Bejsovec Drosophila Apc2 Is a Cytoskeletally-Associated Protein That Regulates Wingless Signaling in the Embryonic Epidermis J. Cell Biol., September 20, 1999; 146(6): 1303 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Tingvall, E. Roos, and Y. Engstrom The GATA factor Serpent is required for the onset of the humoral immune response in Drosophila embryos PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 3884 - 3888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||