spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogihara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogihara, S.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 107, Issue 8 2071-2079, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Microtubules are required in amoeba chemotaxis for preferential stabilization of appropriate pseudopods

M Ueda and S Ogihara
Department of Biology, College of General Education, Osaka University, Japan.

Amoebae of Physarum polycephalum exhibit chemotactic responses to glucose and to cAMP. The chemotaxing amoebae exhibit alternating locomotive movements: relatively linear locomotion and movements that change the direction of the locomotion. Such locomotive activity is tightly coupled with the changes in the number and the positions of the pseudopods; cells have one pseudopod at the leading edge during their linear locomotion, while they have multiple pseudopods when they are changing the direction of locomotion. Treatment of cells with microtubule-disrupting reagents inhibited the chemotaxis of the cells. To characterize the role of the microtubule system in chemotaxis, we quantitatively analyzed the relationship between the positions of multiple pseudopods of the amoebae and the relative stability of the pseudopods during reorientation. No significant differences were observed in the pseudopod dynamics between the untreated and the treated amoebae. In both cases, one pseudopod at the leading edge continued to expand during linear locomotion. It then split into two to three pseudopods in the reorientation phase, and the positions of the multiple pseudopods were random. Among multiple pseudopods, however, the pseudopods closer to the microneedle tip were selectively stabilized more often than those distant from the tip in the presence of the microtubule system. By contrast, such preferential stabilization of the appropriate pseudopods was completely abolished by microtubule inhibitors. The microtubule-dependent selection of appropriately located pseudopods enables amoebae to turn correctly at the reorientation step.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biophys. JHome page
J. Satulovsky, R. Lui, and Y.-l. Wang
Exploring the Control Circuit of Cell Migration by Mathematical Modeling
Biophys. J., May 1, 2008; 94(9): 3671 - 3683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Brahmbhatt and R. L. Klemke
ERK and RhoA Differentially Regulate Pseudopodia Growth and Retraction during Chemotaxis
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13016 - 13025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. Wittmann and C. M. Waterman-Storer
Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way?
J. Cell Sci., January 11, 2001; 114(21): 3795 - 3803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ueda, R. Graf, H. K. MacWilliams, M. Schliwa, and U. Euteneuer
Centrosome positioning and directionality of cell movements
PNAS, September 2, 1997; 94(18): 9674 - 9678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994