spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicol, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppesen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicol, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppesen, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 109, Issue 9 2221-2228, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Chromatin organization in the homogeneously staining regions of a methotrexate-resistant mouse cell line: interspersion of inactive and active chromatin domains distinguished by acetylation of histone H4

L Nicol and P Jeppesen
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

We have analyzed the organization of the homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) in chromosomes from a methotrexate-resistant mouse melanoma cell line. Fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques were used to localize satellite DNA sequences and the amplified copies of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene that confer drug-resistance, in combination with immunofluorescence using antibody probes to differentiate chromatin structure. We show that the major DNA species contained in the HSRs is mouse major satellite, confirming previous reports, and that this is interspersed with DHFR DNA in an alternating tandem array that can be resolved at the cytological level. Mouse minor satellite DNA, which is normally located at centromeres, is also distributed along the HSRs, but does not appear to interfere with centromere function. The blocks of major satellite DNA are coincident with chromatin domains that are labelled by an autoantibody that recognizes a mammalian homologue of Drosophila heterochromatin-associated protein 1, shown previously to be confined to centric heterochromatin in mouse. An antiserum that specifically recognizes acetylated histone H4, a marker for active chromatin, fails to bind to the satellite DNA domains, but labels the intervening segments containing DHFR DNA. We can find no evidence for the spreading of the inactive chromatin domains into adjacent active chromatin, even after extended passaging of cells in the absence of methotrexate selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Biol. CellHome page
R. Papait, C. Pistore, D. Negri, D. Pecoraro, L. Cantarini, and I. M. Bonapace
Np95 Is Implicated in Pericentromeric Heterochromatin Replication and in Major Satellite Silencing
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1098 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
N. Shimizu and K. Shingaki
Macroscopic folding and replication of the homogeneously staining region in late S phase leads to the appearance of replication bands in mitotic chromosomes
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2004; 117(22): 5303 - 5312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCBHome page
M. Guenatri, D. Bailly, C. Maison, and G. Almouzni
Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin
J. Cell Biol., August 16, 2004; 166(4): 493 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996