|
|
![]() |
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 110, Issue 21 2673-2682, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
JM Craig, S Boyle, P Perry and WA Bickmore
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
It is generally agreed that, above the level of the 30 nm fibre, eukaryotic chromatin is constrained into loops, but there is disagreement about the nature of the substructure that serves to anchor loops and the DNA sequences that act as the attachment sites. This problem may stem from the very different methods that all purport to separate loop and attached DNAs. We have tested ideas about how the genome is arranged into loops by analysing the average loop size over different cytologically resolvable regions of human chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridisation with loop and attached DNA fractions. Variations in average loop size, along and between chromosomes, measurable at this level of resolution were small but significant and were dependent on the extraction method. This emphasises the fundamental differences between the nuclear substructure probed by different protocols. DNA attached to the nuclear 'scaffold' or 'matrix' hybridises preferentially to gene-poor regions of the genome (G-bands). Conversely, fractions attached to the nuclear 'skeleton' hybridise preferentially to gene-rich R-bands and sites of high levels of transcription. The inactive X chromosome has a deficit of associations with the nuclear skeleton but not with the matrix or scaffold. A large excess of attached sequences is found at some sites of constitutive heterochromatin, but not at centromeres.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Linnemann, A. E. Platts, and S. A. Krawetz Differential nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment marks expressed genes Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2009; 18(4): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Q. Heng, S. Goetze, C. J. Ye, G. Liu, J. B. Stevens, S. W. Bremer, S. M. Wykes, J. Bode, and S. A. Krawetz Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2004; 117(7): 999 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Maya-Mendoza, R. Hernandez-Munoz, P. Gariglio, and A. Aranda-Anzaldo Gene positional changes relative to the nuclear substructure correlate with the proliferating status of hepatocytes during liver regeneration Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2003; 31(21): 6168 - 6179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. G. Strukov, Y. Wang, and A. S. Belmont Engineered chromosome regions with altered sequence composition demonstrate hierarchical large-scale folding within metaphase chromosomes J. Cell Biol., July 7, 2003; 162(1): 23 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sumer, J. M. Craig, M. Sibson, and K.H. A. Choo A Rapid Method of Genomic Array Analysis of Scaffold/Matrix Attachment Regions (S/MARs) Identifies a 2.5-Mb Region of Enhanced Scaffold/Matrix Attachment at a Human Neocentromere Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1737 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Surralles, M. J. Ramirez, R. Marcos, A. T. Natarajan, and L. H. F. Mullenders Clusters of transcription-coupled repair in the human genome PNAS, August 6, 2002; 99(16): 10571 - 10574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nagele, A. Velasco, W. Anderson, D. McMahon, Z Thomson, J Fazekas, K Wind, and H Lee Telomere associations in interphase nuclei: possible role in maintenance of interphase chromosome topology J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2001; 114(2): 377 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Langdon, C. Seago, R. N. Jones, H. Ougham, H. Thomas, J. W. Forster, and G. Jenkins De Novo Evolution of Satellite DNA on the Rye B Chromosome Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 869 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Weipoltshammer, C. Schofer, M. Almeder, V. V. Philimonenko, K. Frei, F. Wachtler, and P. Hozak Intranuclear Anchoring of Repetitive DNA Sequences: Centromeres, Telomeres, and Ribosomal DNA J. Cell Biol., December 27, 1999; 147(7): 1409 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Greally, T. A. Gray, J. M. Gabriel, L. q. Song, S. Zemel, and R. D. Nicholls Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14430 - 14435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Croft, J. M. Bridger, S. Boyle, P. Perry, P. Teague, and W. A. Bickmore Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus J. Cell Biol., June 14, 1999; 145(6): 1119 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||