spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bickmore, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Craig, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bickmore, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 110, Issue 21 2673-2682, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Scaffold attachments within the human genome

JM Craig, S Boyle, P Perry and WA Bickmore
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

It is generally agreed that, above the level of the 30 nm fibre, eukaryotic chromatin is constrained into loops, but there is disagreement about the nature of the substructure that serves to anchor loops and the DNA sequences that act as the attachment sites. This problem may stem from the very different methods that all purport to separate loop and attached DNAs. We have tested ideas about how the genome is arranged into loops by analysing the average loop size over different cytologically resolvable regions of human chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridisation with loop and attached DNA fractions. Variations in average loop size, along and between chromosomes, measurable at this level of resolution were small but significant and were dependent on the extraction method. This emphasises the fundamental differences between the nuclear substructure probed by different protocols. DNA attached to the nuclear 'scaffold' or 'matrix' hybridises preferentially to gene-poor regions of the genome (G-bands). Conversely, fractions attached to the nuclear 'skeleton' hybridise preferentially to gene-rich R-bands and sites of high levels of transcription. The inactive X chromosome has a deficit of associations with the nuclear skeleton but not with the matrix or scaffold. A large excess of attached sequences is found at some sites of constitutive heterochromatin, but not at centromeres.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. K. Linnemann, A. E. Platts, and S. A. Krawetz
Differential nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment marks expressed genes
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2009; 18(4): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
H. H. Q. Heng, S. Goetze, C. J. Ye, G. Liu, J. B. Stevens, S. W. Bremer, S. M. Wykes, J. Bode, and S. A. Krawetz
Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2004; 117(7): 999 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Maya-Mendoza, R. Hernandez-Munoz, P. Gariglio, and A. Aranda-Anzaldo
Gene positional changes relative to the nuclear substructure correlate with the proliferating status of hepatocytes during liver regeneration
Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2003; 31(21): 6168 - 6179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
Y. G. Strukov, Y. Wang, and A. S. Belmont
Engineered chromosome regions with altered sequence composition demonstrate hierarchical large-scale folding within metaphase chromosomes
J. Cell Biol., July 7, 2003; 162(1): 23 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
H. Sumer, J. M. Craig, M. Sibson, and K.H. A. Choo
A Rapid Method of Genomic Array Analysis of Scaffold/Matrix Attachment Regions (S/MARs) Identifies a 2.5-Mb Region of Enhanced Scaffold/Matrix Attachment at a Human Neocentromere
Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1737 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Surralles, M. J. Ramirez, R. Marcos, A. T. Natarajan, and L. H. F. Mullenders
Clusters of transcription-coupled repair in the human genome
PNAS, August 6, 2002; 99(16): 10571 - 10574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Nagele, A. Velasco, W. Anderson, D. McMahon, Z Thomson, J Fazekas, K Wind, and H Lee
Telomere associations in interphase nuclei: possible role in maintenance of interphase chromosome topology
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2001; 114(2): 377 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. Langdon, C. Seago, R. N. Jones, H. Ougham, H. Thomas, J. W. Forster, and G. Jenkins
De Novo Evolution of Satellite DNA on the Rye B Chromosome
Genetics, February 1, 2000; 154(2): 869 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCBHome page
K. Weipoltshammer, C. Schofer, M. Almeder, V. V. Philimonenko, K. Frei, F. Wachtler, and P. Hozak
Intranuclear Anchoring of Repetitive DNA Sequences: Centromeres, Telomeres, and Ribosomal DNA
J. Cell Biol., December 27, 1999; 147(7): 1409 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Greally, T. A. Gray, J. M. Gabriel, L. q. Song, S. Zemel, and R. D. Nicholls
Conserved characteristics of heterochromatin-forming DNA at the 15q11-q13 imprinting center
PNAS, December 7, 1999; 96(25): 14430 - 14435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
J. A. Croft, J. M. Bridger, S. Boyle, P. Perry, P. Teague, and W. A. Bickmore
Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus
J. Cell Biol., June 14, 1999; 145(6): 1119 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997