spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oblin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oblin, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 110, Issue 4 477-487, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Chromatin modifications during oogenesis in the mouse: removal of somatic subtypes of histone H1 from oocyte chromatin occurs post-natally through a post-transcriptional mechanism

HJ Clarke, M Bustin and C Oblin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. hugh@rvhob2.lan.mcgill.ca

We examined the distribution of the somatic subtypes of histone H1 and the variant subtype, H1(0), and their encoding mRNAs during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in the mouse. As detected using immunocytochemistry, somatic H1 was present in the nuclei of oocytes of 18-day embryos. Following birth, however, somatic H1 became less abundant in both growing and non-growing oocytes, beginning as early as 4 days of age in the growing oocytes, and was scarcely detectable by 19 days. Together with previous results, this defines a period of time when somatic H1 is depleted in oocytes, namely, from shortly after birth when the oocytes are at prophase I until the 4-cell stage following fertilization. At the stages when somatic H1 was undetectable, oocyte nuclei could be stained using an antibody raised against histone H1(0), which suggests that this may be a major linker histone in these cells. In contrast to the post-natal loss of somatic H1 protein, mRNAs encoding four (H1a, H1b, H1d, H1e) of the five somatic subtypes were present, as detected using RT-PCR in growing oocytes of 9-day pups, and all five subtypes including H1c were present in fully grown oocytes of adults. All five subtypes were also present in embryos, both before and after activation of the embryonic genome. mRNA encoding H1(0) was also detected in oocytes and early embryos. Whole-mount in situ hybridization using cloned H1c and H1e cDNAs revealed that the mRNAs were present in the cytoplasm of oocytes and 1-cell embryos, in contrast to the sea urchin early embryo where they are sequestered in the cell nucleus. We suggest that, as in many somatic cell types, the chromatin of mouse oocytes becomes depleted of somatic H1 and relatively enriched in histone H1(0) postnatally, and that somatic H1 is reassembled onto chromatin in cleavage-stage embryos. The post-natal loss of somatic H1 appears to be regulated post-transcriptionally by a mechanism not involving nuclear localization.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Wee, D.-B. Koo, B.-S. Song, J.-S. Kim, M.-J. Kang, S.-J. Moon, Y.-K. Kang, K.-K. Lee, and Y.-M. Han
Inheritable Histone H4 Acetylation of Somatic Chromatins in Cloned Embryos
J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 6048 - 6057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Tanaka, M. Kihara, J. D. Hennebold, J. J. Eppig, M. M. Viveiros, B. R. Emery, D. T. Carrell, N. J. Kirkman, B. Meczekalski, J. Zhou, et al.
H1FOO Is Coupled to the Initiation of Oocytic Growth
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 135 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Fu, P. Ghadam, A. Sirotkin, S. Khochbin, A. I. Skoultchi, and H. J. Clarke
Mouse Oocytes and Early Embryos Express Multiple Histone H1 Subtypes
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1569 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
P. Allard, M. J. Champigny, S. Skoggard, J. A. Erkmann, M. L. Whitfield, W. F. Marzluff, and H. J. Clarke
Stem-loop binding protein accumulates during oocyte maturation and is not cell-cycle-regulated in the early mouse embryo
J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2002; 115(23): 4577 - 4586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M Tanaka, J. Hennebold, J Macfarlane, and E. Adashi
A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog
Development, January 3, 2001; 128(5): 655 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
P. Adenot, E Campion, E Legouy, C. Allis, S Dimitrov, J Renard, and E. Thompson
Somatic linker histone H1 is present throughout mouse embryogenesis and is not replaced by variant H1 degrees
J. Cell Sci., January 8, 2000; 113(16): 2897 - 2907.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
V. Bordignon, H. J. Clarke, and L. C. Smith
Developmentally Regulated Loss and Reappearance of Immunoreactive Somatic Histone H1 on Chromatin of Bovine Morula-Stage Nuclei Following Transplantation into Oocytes
Biol Reprod, July 1, 1999; 61(1): 22 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Latham and C Sapienza
Localization of genes encoding egg modifiers of paternal genome function to mouse chromosomes one and two
Development, January 3, 1998; 125(5): 929 - 935.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997