|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 110, Issue 9 1033-1040, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
PR Cook
CRC Nuclear Structure and Function Research Group, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, UK. peter.cook@path.ox.ac.uk
Pairing between homologous chromosomes is essential for successful meiosis; generally only paired homologs recombine and segregate correctly into haploid germ cells. Homologs also pair in some somatic cells (e.g. in diploid and polytene cells of Drosophila). How homologs find their partners is a mystery. First, I review some explanations of how they might do so; most involve base-pairing (i.e. DNA-DNA) interactions. Then I discuss the remarkable fact that chromosomes only pair when they are transcriptionally active. Finally, I present a general model for pairing based upon the DNA-protein interactions involved in transcription. Each chromosome in the haploid set has a unique array of transcription units strung along its length. Therefore, each chromatin fibre will be folded into a unique array of loops associated with clusters of polymerases and transcription factors; only homologs share similar arrays. As these loops and clusters, or transcription factories, move continually, they make and break contact with others. Correct pairing would be nucleated when a promoter in a loop tethered to one factory binds to a homologous polymerizing site in another factory, before transcription stabilizes the association. This increases the chances that adjacent promoters will bind to their homologs, so that chromosomes eventually become zipped together with their partners. Pairing is then the inevitable consequence of transcription of partially-condensed chromosomes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Xu and P. R. Cook Similar active genes cluster in specialized transcription factories J. Cell Biol., May 19, 2008; 181(4): 615 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Sybenga, H. Verhaar, and D. G. A. Botje Epigenetic Control May Explain Large Within-Plant Heterogeneity of Meiotic Behavior in Telocentric Trisomics of Rye Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 1915 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Marenduzzo, K. Finan, and P. R. Cook The depletion attraction: an underappreciated force driving cellular organization J. Cell Biol., December 4, 2006; 175(5): 681 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Lee and C.-t. Wu Enhancer-Promoter Communication at the yellow Gene of Drosophila melanogaster: Diverse Promoters Participate in and Regulate trans Interactions Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 1867 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Marenduzzo, C. Micheletti, and P. R. Cook Entropy-Driven Genome Organization Biophys. J., May 15, 2006; 90(10): 3712 - 3721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. S. Cho, N. Iguchi, J. Yang, M. A. Handel, and N. B. Hecht Meiotic Messenger RNA and Noncoding RNA Targets of the RNA-Binding Protein Translin (TSN) in Mouse Testis Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 840 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. N. Thatcher, S. Peddada, D. H. Yasui, and J. M. LaSalle Homologous pairing of 15q11-13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2005; 14(6): 785 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Webster, M. K. O'Bryan, S. Fletcher, P. E. Crewther, U. Aapola, J. Craig, D. K. Harrison, H. Aung, N. Phutikanit, R. Lyle, et al. Meiotic and epigenetic defects in Dnmt3L-knockout mouse spermatogenesis PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 4068 - 4073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. Lee, K.-Y. Seong, R. J. Pratt, K. Baker, and R. Aramayo Properties of Unpaired DNA Required For Efficient Silencing in Neurospora crassa Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 131 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-C. Marin, J.-R. Rodriguez, and A. Ferrus Transcription of Drosophila Troponin I Gene Is Regulated by Two Conserved, Functionally Identical, Synergistic Elements Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1185 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Bantignies, C. Grimaud, S. Lavrov, M. Gabut, and G. Cavalli Inheritance of Polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions in Drosophila Genes & Dev., October 1, 2003; 17(19): 2406 - 2420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.H. Vazquez-Nin, O.M. Echeverria, R. Ortiz, C. Scassellati, T.E. Martin, E. Ubaldo, and S. Fakan Fine Structural Cytochemical Analysis of Homologous Chromosome Recognition, Alignment, and Pairing in Guinea Pig Spermatogonia and Spermatocytes Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1362 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Vinogradov Isochores and tissue-specificity Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5212 - 5220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Schwarzacher Meiosis, recombination and chromosomes: a review of gene isolation and fluorescent in situ hybridization data in plants J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2003; 54(380): 11 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Fuchs, A. Lorenz, and J. Loidl Chromosome associations in budding yeast caused by integrated tandemly repeated transgenes J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2002; 115(6): 1213 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Bass, O Riera-Lizarazu, E. Ananiev, S. Bordoli, H. Rines, R. Phillips, J. Sedat, D. Agard, and W. Cande Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere-clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase J. Cell Sci., January 3, 2000; 113(6): 1033 - 1042. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. G. Sathyanarayana, L. A. Freeman, M.-S. Lee, and W. T. Garrard RNA Polymerase-specific Nucleosome Disruption by Transcription in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 1999; 274(23): 16431 - 16436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Morris, P. K. Geyer, and C.-t. Wu Core promoter elements can regulate transcription on a separate chromosome in trans Genes & Dev., February 1, 1999; 13(3): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Morris, J.-l. Chen, S. T. Filandrinos, R. C. Dunn, R. Fisk, P. K. Geyer, and C.-t. Wu An Analysis of Transvection at the yellow Locus of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 633 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.-w. Jin, E. Trelles-Sticken, H. Scherthan, and J. Loidl Yeast Nuclei Display Prominent Centromere Clustering That Is Reduced in Nondividing Cells and in Meiotic Prophase J. Cell Biol., April 6, 1998; 141(1): 21 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gemkow, P. Verveer, and D. Arndt-Jovin Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster Development, January 11, 1998; 125(22): 4541 - 4552. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Scherthan, R Eils, E Trelles-Sticken, S Dietzel, T Cremer, H Walt, and A Jauch Aspects of three-dimensional chromosome reorganization during the onset of human male meiotic prophase J. Cell Sci., January 8, 1998; 111(16): 2337 - 2351. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
