|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 112, Issue 16 2607-2613, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
CL Rieder and R Cole
Wadsworth Center, New York State Dept of Health, PO Box 509, Albany, New York 12201-0509, USA. rieder@wadsworth.org
The equal distribution of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis is dependent on the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion. In this commentary we review the evidence that, during meiosis, the mechanism underlying the cohesion of chromatids along their arms is different from that responsible for cohesion in the centromere region. We then argue that the chromatids on a mitotic chromosome are also tethered along their arms and in the centromere by different mechanisms, and that the functional action of these two mechanisms can be temporally separated under various conditions. Finally, we demonstrate that in the absence of a centromeric tether, arm cohesion is sufficient to maintain chromatid cohesion during prometaphase of mitosis. This finding provides a straightforward explanation for why mutants in proteins responsible for centromeric cohesion in Drosophila (e.g. ord, mei-s332) disrupt meiosis but not mitosis.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Schubert, M. Klatte, A. Pecinka, A. Meister, Z. Jasencakova, and I. Schubert Sister Chromatids Are Often Incompletely Aligned in Meristematic and Endopolyploid Interphase Nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 467 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nasmyth How might cohesin hold sister chromatids together? Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2005; 360(1455): 483 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Eijpe, H. Offenberg, R. Jessberger, E. Revenkova, and C. Heyting Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1{beta} and SMC3 J. Cell Biol., March 3, 2003; 160(5): 657 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Mercier, D. Vezon, E. Bullier, J. C. Motamayor, A. Sellier, F. Lefevre, G. Pelletier, and C. Horlow SWITCH1 (SWI1): a novel protein required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and for bivalent formation at meiosis Genes & Dev., July 15, 2001; 15(14): 1859 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pasierbek, M. Jantsch, M. Melcher, A. Schleiffer, D. Schweizer, and J. Loidl A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction Genes & Dev., June 1, 2001; 15(11): 1349 - 1360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. LeMaire-Adkins and P. A. Hunt Nonrandom Segregation of the Mouse Univalent X Chromosome: Evidence of Spindle-Mediated Meiotic Drive Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 775 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nasmyth, J. Peters, and F. Uhlmann Splitting the Chromosome: Cutting the Ties That Bind Sister Chromatids Science, May 26, 2000; 288(5470): 1379 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E Kaszas and W. Cande Phosphorylation of histone H3 is correlated with changes in the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in maize, rather than the condensation of the chromatin J. Cell Sci., January 9, 2000; 113(18): 3217 - 3226. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
