QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hodges, C. A. Articles by Hunt, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hodges, C. A. Articles by Hunt, P. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coordinating the segregation of sister chromatids during the first meiotic division: evidence for sexual dimorphism

Department of Genetics and Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955, USA

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: pah13{at}po.cwru.edu)

Accepted April 5, 2001

Errors during the first meiotic division are common in our species, but virtually all occur during female meiosis. The reason why oogenesis is more error prone than spermatogenesis remains unknown. Normal segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first meiotic division (MI) requires coordinated behavior of the sister chromatids of each homolog. Failure of sister kinetochores to act cooperatively at MI, or precocious sister chromatid segregation (PSCS), has been postulated to be a major contributor to human nondisjunction. To investigate the factors that influence PSCS we utilized the XO mouse, since the chromatids of the single X chromosome frequently segregate at MI, and the propensity for PSCS is influenced by genetic background. Our studies demonstrate that the strain-specific differences in PSCS are due to the actions of an autosomal trans-acting factor or factors. Since components of the synaptonemal complex are thought to play a role in centromere cohesion and kinetochore orientation, we evaluated the behavior of the X chromosome at prophase to determine if this factor influenced the propensity of the chromosome for self-synapsis. We were unable to directly correlate synaptic differences with subsequent segregation behavior. However, unexpectedly, we uncovered a sexual dimorphism that may partially explain sex-specific differences in the fidelity of meiotic chromosome segregation. Specifically, in the male remnants of the synaptonemal complex remain associated with the centromeres until anaphase of the second meiotic division (MII), whereas in the female, all traces of synaptonemal complex (SC) protein components are lost from the chromosomes before the onset of the first meiotic division. This finding suggests a sex-specific difference in the components used to correctly segregate chromosomes during meiosis, and may provide a reason for the high error frequency during female meiosis.

Key words: Meiosis, Nondisjunction, Sister chromatid cohesion, Synaptonemal complex, XO mouse

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. E. Holt and K. T. Jones Control of homologous chromosome division in the mammalian oocyte Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2009; 15(3): 139 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kan, X. Sun, N. K. Kolas, E. Avdievich, B. Kneitz, W. Edelmann, and P. E. Cohen Comparative Analysis of Meiotic Progression in Female Mice Bearing Mutations in Genes of the DNA Mismatch Repair Pathway Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 462 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kuznetsov, M. Pellegrini, K. Shuda, O. Fernandez-Capetillo, Y. Liu, B. K. Martin, S. Burkett, E. Southon, D. Pati, L. Tessarollo, et al. RAD51C deficiency in mice results in early prophase I arrest in males and sister chromatid separation at metaphase II in females J. Cell Biol., February 26, 2007; 176(5): 581 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wang and C. Hoog Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes J. Cell Biol., May 22, 2006; 173(4): 485 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A Morelli and P. E Cohen Not all germ cells are created equal: Aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 761 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kouznetsova, I. Novak, R. Jessberger, and C. Hoog SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2005; 118(10): 2271 - 2278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Wu, L. Hao, Z. Han, S. Gao, K. E. Latham, F. P.-M. de Villena, and C. Sapienza Maternal Transmission Ratio Distortion at the Mouse Om Locus Results From Meiotic Drive at the Second Meiotic Division Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Koehler, E. A. Millie, J. P. Cherry, P. S. Burgoyne, E. P. Evans, P. A. Hunt, and T. J. Hassold Sex-Specific Differences in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Revealed by Dicentric Bridge Resolution in Mice Genetics, November 1, 2002; 162(3): 1367 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Underkoffler, L. E. Mitchell, A. R. Localio, S. M. Marchegiani, J. Morabito, J. N. Collins, and R. J. Oakey Molecular Analysis of Nondisjunction in Mice Heterozygous for a Robertsonian Translocation Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1219 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Yuan, J.-G. Liu, M.-R. Hoja, J. Wilbertz, K. Nordqvist, and C. Hoog Female Germ Cell Aneuploidy and Embryo Death in Mice Lacking the Meiosis-Specific Protein SCP3 Science, May 10, 2002; 296(5570): 1115 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]