QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nicklas, R. B. Articles by Ward, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicklas, R. B. Articles by Ward, S. C.

Checkpoint signals in grasshopper meiosis are sensitive to microtubule attachment, but tension is still essential

¹ Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-1000, USA
² Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
³ Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA

*Author for correspondence (e-mail: bnicklas{at}duke.edu)

Accepted August 28, 2001

The spindle checkpoint detects errors in kinetochore attachment to microtubules and delays anaphase if attachment is improper. The checkpoint is activated by attachment-sensitive components including Mad2 and certain phosphorylated proteins detected by the 3F3/2 antibody. We have studied Mad2 and 3F3/2 immunofluorescence in grasshopper spermatocytes. As in other cells, unattached kinetochores are loaded with Mad2 and are highly phosphorylated, whereas after proper attachment, Mad2 is lost and kinetochores are dephosphorylated. What is it about proper attachment that produces these changes – is it microtubule attachment itself or is it the tension from mitotic forces that follows proper attachment? Using micromanipulation, we created an intermediate state, weak attachment, that provides an answer. Weakly attached kinetochores are not under tension and have few kinetochore microtubules. Despite the absence of tension, many weakly attached kinetochores lose their Mad2 and become dephosphorylated. Therefore we conclude that microtubule attachment determines both Mad2 binding and phosphorylation. Nevertheless, tension plays an absolutely essential role. Tension elevates the number of kinetochore microtubules to the level necessary for the complete loss of Mad2 and dephosphorylation from all kinetochores. This gives a reliable ‘all clear’ signal to the checkpoint, allowing the cell to progress to anaphase.

Key words: Spindle checkpoint, Mad2, Microtubules, Kinetochore, Micromanipulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. B. O'Connell, J. Loncarek, P. Hergert, A. Kourtidis, D. S. Conklin, and A. Khodjakov The spindle assembly checkpoint is satisfied in the absence of interkinetochore tension during mitosis with unreplicated genomes J. Cell Biol., October 6, 2008; 183(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Brito, Z. Yang, and C. L. Rieder Microtubules do not promote mitotic slippage when the spindle assembly checkpoint cannot be satisfied J. Cell Biol., August 25, 2008; 182(4): 623 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Okouneva, O. Azarenko, L. Wilson, B. A. Littlefield, and M. A. Jordan Inhibition of centromere dynamics by eribulin (E7389) during mitotic metaphase Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2008; 7(7): 2003 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Schafer-Hales, J. Iaconelli, J. P. Snyder, A. Prussia, J. H. Nettles, A. El-Naggar, F. R. Khuri, P. Giannakakou, and A. I. Marcus Farnesyl transferase inhibitors impair chromosomal maintenance in cell lines and human tumors by compromising CENP-E and CENP-F function Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2007; 6(4): 1317 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. May and K. G. Hardwick The spindle checkpoint J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2006; 119(20): 4139 - 4142. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Powell An unattached kinetochore screams "Wait!" J. Cell Biol., April 24, 2006; 173(2): 152 - 152. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Mao, A. Desai, and D. W. Cleveland Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling J. Cell Biol., September 12, 2005; 170(6): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Gardner, C. G. Pearson, B. L. Sprague, T. R. Zarzar, K. Bloom, E. D. Salmon, and D. J. Odde Tension-dependent Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics at Kinetochores Can Explain Metaphase Congression in Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3764 - 3775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Maiato, J. DeLuca, E. D. Salmon, and W. C. Earnshaw The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2004; 117(23): 5461 - 5477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Zhang, W. Ma, Y.-H. Li, Y. Hou, S.-W. Li, X.-Q. Meng, X.-F. Sun, Q.-Y. Sun, and W.-H. Wang Intra-oocyte Localization of MAD2 and Its Relationship with Kinetochores, Microtubules, and Chromosomes in Rat Oocytes During Meiosis Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pan and R.-H. Chen Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genes & Dev., June 15, 2004; 18(12): 1439 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Voet, B. Liebe, C. Labaere, P. Marynen, and H. Scherthan Telomere-independent homologue pairing and checkpoint escape of accessory ring chromosomes in male mouse meiosis J. Cell Biol., September 1, 2003; 162(5): 795 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kelling, K. Sullivan, L. Wilson, and M. A. Jordan Suppression of Centromere Dynamics by Taxol(R) in Living Osteosarcoma Cells Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2794 - 2801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Sprague, C. G. Pearson, P. S. Maddox, K. S. Bloom, E. D. Salmon, and David. J. Odde Mechanisms of Microtubule-Based Kinetochore Positioning in the Yeast Metaphase Spindle Biophys. J., June 1, 2003; 84(6): 3529 - 3546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Okouneva, B. T. Hill, L. Wilson, and M. A. Jordan The Effects of Vinflunine, Vinorelbine, and Vinblastine on Centromere Dynamics Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2003; 2(5): 427 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hauf, R. W. Cole, S. LaTerra, C. Zimmer, G. Schnapp, R. Walter, A. Heckel, J. van Meel, C. L. Rieder, and J.-M. Peters The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint J. Cell Biol., April 28, 2003; 161(2): 281 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Shannon, J. C. Canman, and E. D. Salmon Mad2 and BubR1 Function in a Single Checkpoint Pathway that Responds to a Loss of Tension Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2002; 13(10): 3706 - 3719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zhou, J. Yao, and H. C. Joshi Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2002; 115(18): 3547 - 3555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Canman, N. Sharma, A. Straight, K. B. Shannon, G. Fang, and E. D. Salmon Anaphase onset does not require the microtubule-dependent depletion of kinetochore and centromere-binding proteins J. Cell Sci., January 10, 2002; 115(19): 3787 - 3795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]