spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gülow, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, I. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gülow, K.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, I. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Cell Science 115, 2443-2452 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited


Research Article

BiP is feed-back regulated by control of protein translation efficiency

Karsten Gülow{ddagger}, Detlef Bienert and Ingrid G. Haas*,§

Biochemie-Zentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
{ddagger} Present address: Division of Immunogenetics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
§ Present address: Max-Planck-Institut für Immunbiologie, Stübeweg 51, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: haasi{at}immunbio.mpg.de )

Accepted 19 March 2002

The lumenal endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein BiP, among its other functions, is believed to serve as an ER stress sensor, triggering the so-called `unfolded protein response' or UPR. For this role, BiP levels are critical. Indeed, here we show that BiP expression is tightly controlled at a post-transcriptional level. Thus, an artificial increase in cellular BiP mRNA does not lead to increased synthesis of BiP in unstressed cells, and, consequently, protein levels remain constant. Under ER stress conditions, however, this homeostatic restriction is alleviated, and independent of transcript levels, the translation efficiency of BiP transcripts is enhanced, allowing the cells to produce more protein. We additionally show that this regulation is independent of elements in the 5' and 3' UTR of BiP mRNA, which rather points to a novel type of translational feedback control. BiP is the first example of a lumenal protein whose expression is controlled at a translational level. The implications of these findings with respect to cellular stress are discussed.

Key words: Cellular stress, Endoplasmic reticulum, Polysome profile, Tunicamycin, Thapsigargin, UPR


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Novel translational control mechanism for BiP

JCS 2002 115: 1103. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Y. Liu, B. K. Law, and H. Luesch
Apratoxin A Reversibly Inhibits the Secretory Pathway by Preventing Cotranslational Translocation
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2009; 76(1): 91 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Trusina, F. R. Papa, and C. Tang
Rationalizing translation attenuation in the network architecture of the unfolded protein response
PNAS, December 23, 2008; 105(51): 20280 - 20285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
G. Dixit, C. Mikoryak, T. Hayslett, A. Bhat, and R. K. Draper
Cholera Toxin Up-Regulates Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteins That Correlate with Sensitivity to the Toxin
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2008; 233(2): 163 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Kaminski, M. Kiessling, D. Suss, P. H. Krammer, and K. Gulow
Novel Role for Mitochondria: Protein Kinase C{theta}-Dependent Oxidative Signaling Organelles in Activation-Induced T-Cell Death
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2007; 27(10): 3625 - 3639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. F. de Almeida, J. V. Fleming, J. E. Azevedo, M. Carmo-Fonseca, and M. de Sousa
Stimulation of an Unfolded Protein Response Impairs MHC Class I Expression
J. Immunol., March 15, 2007; 178(6): 3612 - 3619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
Y. Y. Liu, J. H. Woo, and D. M. Neville Jr.
Overexpression of an Anti-CD3 Immunotoxin Increases Expression and Secretion of Molecular Chaperone BiP/Kar2p by Pichia pastoris
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2005; 71(9): 5332 - 5340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. Maniratanachote, K. Minami, M. Katoh, M. Nakajima, and T. Yokoi
Chaperone Proteins Involved in Troglitazone-Induced Toxicity in Human Hepatoma Cell Lines
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2005; 83(2): 293 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Kebache, E. Cardin, D. T. Nguyen, E. Chevet, and L. Larose
Nck-1 Antagonizes the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-induced Inhibition of Translation
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 9662 - 9671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Dressel, C. Grzeszik, M. Kreiss, D. Lindemann, T. Herrmann, L. Walter, and E. Gunther
Differential Effect of Acute and Permanent Heat Shock Protein 70 Overexpression in Tumor Cells on Lysability by Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8212 - 8220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002