spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dolly, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dolly, J. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Cell Science 115, 2791-2800 (2002)
© 2002 The Company of Biologists Limited


Research Article

Ca2+-induced changes in SNAREs and synaptotagmin I correlate with triggered exocytosis from chromaffin cells: insights gleaned into the signal transduction using trypsin and botulinum toxins

Gary W. Lawrence and J. Oliver Dolly*

Centre for Neurobiochemistry, Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, South Kensington, London SW7 2AY, UK

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: o.dolly{at}ic.ac.uk )

Accepted 15 April 2002

Ca2+-triggered catecholamine exocytosis from chromaffin cells involves SNAP-25, synaptobrevin and syntaxin (known as SNAREs). Synaptotagmin I has been implicated as the Ca2+-sensor because it binds Ca2+, and this enhances its binding to syntaxin, SNAP-25 and phospholipids in vitro. However, most of these interactions are only mediated by [Ca2+]i two orders of magnitude higher than that needed to elicit secretion. Thus, the Ca2+ sensitivities of synaptotagmin I and the other SNAREs were quantified in situ. Secretion elicited from permeabilised cells by µM Ca2+ was accompanied, with almost identical Ca2+ dependencies, by changes in synaptotagmin I, SNAP-25, syntaxin and synaptobrevin that rendered them less susceptible to trypsin. The majority of the trypsin-resistant SNAREs were not associated with SDS-resistant complexes. None of these proteins acquired trypsin resistance in cells rendered incompetent for exocytosis by run-down. Removal of nine C-terminal residues from SNAP-25 by botulinum toxin A reduced both exocytosis and the SNAREs' acquisition of trypsin resistance but did not alter the Ca2+ sensitivity, except for synaptotagmin I. Even after synaptobrevin had been cleaved by botulinum toxin B, all the other proteins still responded to Ca2+. These data support a model whereby Ca2+ is sensed, probably by synaptotagmin I, and the signal passed to syntaxin and SNAP-25 before they interact with synaptobrevin.

Key words: Secretion, Large dense-core granules, SNAP-25, Synaptobrevin, Clostridial neurotoxins


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Meng, S. V. Ovsepian, J. Wang, M. Pickering, A. Sasse, K. R. Aoki, G. W. Lawrence, and J. O. Dolly
Activation of TRPV1 Mediates Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Release, Which Excites Trigeminal Sensory Neurons and Is Attenuated by a Retargeted Botulinum Toxin with Anti-Nociceptive Potential
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4981 - 4992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. G. Duman and J. G. Forte
What is the role of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion?
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): C237 - C249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002