QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.00055

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JCS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cowan, C. R. Articles by Cande, W. Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cowan, C. R. Articles by Cande, W. Z. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Meiotic telomere clustering is inhibited by colchicine but does not require cytoplasmic microtubules

¹ Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California — Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA
² Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California — Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: zcande{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu)

Accepted 14 July 2002

Telomere clustering, the defining feature of the bouquet, is an almost universal feature of meiotic prophase, yet its mechanism remains unknown. The microtubule-depolymerizing agent colchicine was found to inhibit bouquet formation. Telomeres in colchicine-treated cells remained scattered in the nuclear periphery, whereas untreated cells exhibited a prominent telomere cluster. Colchicine administered after the bouquet had formed did not affect telomere dispersal. The effect of colchicine on bouquet formation appeared to be separable from its effect on cytoplasmic microtubules; amiprophos methyl, a highly effective plant microtubule-depolymerizing drug, did not affect telomere clustering. Inhibition of bouquet formation was limited to colchicine and the related drug podophyllotoxin out of the variety of microtubule-depolymerizing drugs tested, suggesting that the target involved in bouquet formation has a structural specificity.

Key words: Bouquet, Telomere cluster, Meiosis, Microtubules, Colchicine, Rye

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Telomere clustering

JCS 2002 115: 1904. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Y. Lui, T. L. Peoples-Holst, J. Chang Mell, H.-Y. Wu, E. W. Dean, and S. M. Burgess Analysis of Close Stable Homolog Juxtaposition During Meiosis in Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1207 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Trelles-Sticken, C. Adelfalk, J. Loidl, and H. Scherthan Meiotic telomere clustering requires actin for its formation and cohesin for its resolution J. Cell Biol., July 18, 2005; 170(2): 213 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Harper, I. Golubovskaya, and W. Z. Cande A bouquet of chromosomes J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2004; 117(18): 4025 - 4032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Carlton, C. R. Cowan, and W. Z. Cande Directed Motion of Telomeres in the Formation of the Meiotic Bouquet Revealed by Time Course and Simulation Analysis Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2003; 14(7): 2832 - 2843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Trelles-Sticken, J. Loidl, and H. Scherthan Increased ploidy and KAR3 and SIR3 disruption alter the dynamics of meiotic chromosomes and telomeres J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2003; 116(12): 2431 - 2442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. N. Golubovskaya, L. C. Harper, W. P. Pawlowski, D. Schichnes, and W. Z. Cande The pam1 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Bouquet Formation and Efficient Homologous Synapsis in Maize (Zea mays L.) Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1979 - 1993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]