spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 22 June 2004
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01204


Journal of Cell Science 117, 3489-3498 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.01204v1
117/16/3489    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latif, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connell, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latif, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connell, M. J.

Research Article

DNA damage checkpoint maintenance through sustained Chk1 activity

Christine Latif1,2, Nicole R. den Elzen1 and Matthew J. O'Connell1,2,3,*

1 Trescowthick Research Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
2 Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
3 Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1130, New York, NY 10029, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: matthew.oconnell{at}mssm.edu)

Accepted 8 March 2004

The G2 DNA damage checkpoint prevents mitotic entry in the presence of DNA damage. This requires the activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinases ATR and ATM in human cells and the ATR homologue Rad3 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Rad3 activates the effector protein kinase Chk1 by phosphorylation. However, in fission yeast, inactivation of Rad3 following checkpoint activation has no impact on checkpoint duration. This demonstrates that Rad3 is not required for checkpoint maintenance and that the processes of checkpoint initiation and maintenance are distinct. Chk1 is required for checkpoint initiation but its role in checkpoint maintenance has not been investigated. We show here that Chk1 kinase activity is rapidly induced following irradiation and is maintained for the duration of a checkpoint arrest. On entry to mitosis, there is a transient decrease in Chk1 activity and phosphorylation, but Chk1 activity remains higher than that observed in unirradiated cells. We have generated temperature-sensitive alleles of chk1, which phenocopy chk1 deletion at the non-permissive temperature. Using these alleles, we have shown that inactivation of Chk1 during a checkpoint arrest leads to premature checkpoint termination, resulting in catastrophic mitoses that are a hallmark of checkpoint failure. Therefore, unlike Rad3, Chk1 is an important determinant of both checkpoint initiation and maintenance.

Key words: Checkpoint, Chk1, DNA damage, Protein kinase




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
C. Rostek, E. L. Turner, M. Robbins, S. Rightnar, W. Xiao, A. Obenaus, and T. A. A. Harkness
Involvement of homologous recombination repair after proton-induced DNA damage
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2008; 23(2): 119 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Kosoy, T. M. Calonge, E. A. Outwin, and M. J. O'Connell
Fission Yeast Rnf4 Homologs Are Required for DNA Repair
J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2007; 282(28): 20388 - 20394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. M. Lee, S. Nizza, T. Hayes, K. L. Bass, A. Irmisch, J. M. Murray, and M. J. O'Connell
Brc1-Mediated Rescue of Smc5/6 Deficiency: Requirement for Multiple Nucleases and a Novel Rad18 Function
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1585 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. M. Calonge and M. J. O'Connell
Antagonism of Chk1 Signaling in the G2 DNA Damage Checkpoint by Dominant Alleles of Cdr1
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. O'Brien and R. Brown
Signalling cell cycle arrest and cell death through the MMR System
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 682 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. J. O'Connell and K. A. Cimprich
G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on?
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2005; 118(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004