|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 22 June 2004
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01204
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Trescowthick Research Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
2 Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
3 Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1130, New York, NY 10029, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: matthew.oconnell{at}mssm.edu)
Accepted 8 March 2004
The G2 DNA damage checkpoint prevents mitotic entry in the presence of DNA damage. This requires the activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinases ATR and ATM in human cells and the ATR homologue Rad3 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Rad3 activates the effector protein kinase Chk1 by phosphorylation. However, in fission yeast, inactivation of Rad3 following checkpoint activation has no impact on checkpoint duration. This demonstrates that Rad3 is not required for checkpoint maintenance and that the processes of checkpoint initiation and maintenance are distinct. Chk1 is required for checkpoint initiation but its role in checkpoint maintenance has not been investigated. We show here that Chk1 kinase activity is rapidly induced following irradiation and is maintained for the duration of a checkpoint arrest. On entry to mitosis, there is a transient decrease in Chk1 activity and phosphorylation, but Chk1 activity remains higher than that observed in unirradiated cells. We have generated temperature-sensitive alleles of chk1, which phenocopy chk1 deletion at the non-permissive temperature. Using these alleles, we have shown that inactivation of Chk1 during a checkpoint arrest leads to premature checkpoint termination, resulting in catastrophic mitoses that are a hallmark of checkpoint failure. Therefore, unlike Rad3, Chk1 is an important determinant of both checkpoint initiation and maintenance.
Key words: Checkpoint, Chk1, DNA damage, Protein kinase
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Kosoy and M. J. O'Connell Regulation of Chk1 by Its C-terminal Domain Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2008; 19(11): 4546 - 4553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Rostek, E. L. Turner, M. Robbins, S. Rightnar, W. Xiao, A. Obenaus, and T. A. A. Harkness Involvement of homologous recombination repair after proton-induced DNA damage Mutagenesis, March 1, 2008; 23(2): 119 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kosoy, T. M. Calonge, E. A. Outwin, and M. J. O'Connell Fission Yeast Rnf4 Homologs Are Required for DNA Repair J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2007; 282(28): 20388 - 20394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Lee, S. Nizza, T. Hayes, K. L. Bass, A. Irmisch, J. M. Murray, and M. J. O'Connell Brc1-Mediated Rescue of Smc5/6 Deficiency: Requirement for Multiple Nucleases and a Novel Rad18 Function Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1585 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Calonge and M. J. O'Connell Antagonism of Chk1 Signaling in the G2 DNA Damage Checkpoint by Dominant Alleles of Cdr1 Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 113 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. O'Brien and R. Brown Signalling cell cycle arrest and cell death through the MMR System Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 682 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. O'Connell and K. A. Cimprich G2 damage checkpoints: what is the turn-on? J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2005; 118(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
