|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online August 17, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.01352
Commentary |
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, and SORST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
e-mail: ywatanab{at}iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Meiosis produces haploid gametes from diploid cells in two stages that in many ways resemble mitosis. However, the regulatory mechanisms governing kinetochore orientation and cohesion at the first meiotic division are different from those at mitosis: sister kinetochores are pulled forwards from the same spindle pole at metaphase, and centromeric cohesion is protected throughout anaphase. Consequently, homologous chromosomes, rather than sister chromatids, segregate to the opposite sides of a cell. The residual cohesion around centromeres plays an essential role at the second meiotic division, when spindle microtubules from opposite poles attach to sister chromatids. Recent studies have identified novel meiosis-specific kinetochore proteins, such as monopolin and shugoshin, and indicate that specific modifications in sister chromatid cohesion lie at the heart of the regulation of meiotic chromosome segregation.
Key words: Sister chromatid cohesion, Meiosis, Monopolar attachment, Centromeric protection, Cohesin, Monopolin, Shugoshin
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Holt and K. T. Jones Control of homologous chromosome division in the mammalian oocyte Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2009; 15(3): 139 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Peters, A. Tedeschi, and J. Schmitz The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology Genes & Dev., November 15, 2008; 22(22): 3089 - 3114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Riehs, S. Akimcheva, J. Puizina, P. Bulankova, R. A. Idol, J. Siroky, A. Schleiffer, D. Schweizer, D. E. Shippen, and K. Riha Arabidopsis SMG7 protein is required for exit from meiosis J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2008; 121(13): 2208 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cukurcam, I. Betzendahl, G. Michel, E. Vogt, C. Hegele-Hartung, B. Lindenthal, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter Influence of follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol on aneuploidy rate and precocious chromatid segregation in aged mouse oocytes Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 815 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Ishiguro and Y. Watanabe Chromosome cohesion in mitosis and meiosis J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2007; 120(3): 367 - 369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kerzendorfer, J. Vignard, A. Pedrosa-Harand, T. Siwiec, S. Akimcheva, S. Jolivet, R. Sablowski, S. Armstrong, D. Schweizer, R. Mercier, et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana MND1 homologue plays a key role in meiotic homologous pairing, synapsis and recombination J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2006; 119(12): 2486 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A Homer, A. McDougall, M. Levasseur, A. P Murdoch, and M. Herbert Mad2 is required for inhibiting securin and cyclin B degradation following spindle depolymerisation in meiosis I mouse oocytes Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 829 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chelysheva, S. Diallo, D. Vezon, G. Gendrot, N. Vrielynck, K. Belcram, N. Rocques, A. Marquez-Lema, A. M. Bhatt, C. Horlow, et al. AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4621 - 4632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Huang, R. Hatcher, J. P. York, and P. Zhang Securin and Separase Phosphorylation Act Redundantly to Maintain Sister Chromatid Cohesion in Mammalian Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2005; 16(10): 4725 - 4732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Tang, Y. Sun, S. E. Harley, H. Zou, and H. Yu Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through Shugoshin during mitosis PNAS, December 28, 2004; 101(52): 18012 - 18017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||