|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online March 2, 2004
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.00976
Research Article |
1 Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
3 Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
5 German Research Center for Biotechnology, RDIF/Epigenetic Regulation, Mascheroder Weg 1, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
6 SeeDNA Biotech Inc, Windsor, ON N9A 4J2, Canada
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: hheng{at}genetics.wayne.edu)
The biological significance of nuclear scaffold/matrix-attachment regions (S/MARs) remains a topic of long-standing interest. The key to understanding S/MAR behavior relies on determining the physical attributes of in vivo S/MARs and whether they serve as rigid or flexible chromatin loop anchors. To analyze S/MAR behavior, single and multiple copies of the S/MAR-containing constructs were introduced into various host genomes of transgenic mice and transfected cell lines. These in vivo integration events provided a system to study the association and integration patterns of each introduced S/MAR. By utilizing FISH to visualize directly the localization of S/MARs on the nuclear matrix or chromatin loop, we were able to assign specific attributes to the S/MAR. Surprisingly, when multiple-copy S/MARs were introduced they were selected and used as nuclear matrix anchors in a discriminatory manner, even though they all contained identical primary sequences. This selection process was probably mediated by S/MAR availability including binding strength and copy number, as reflected by the expression profiles and association of multi-copy tandem inserted constructs. Whereas S/MARs functioned as the mediators of loop attachment, they were used in a selective and dynamic fashion. Consequently, S/MAR anchors were necessary but not sufficient for chromatin loops to form. These observations reconcile many seemingly contradictory attributes previously associated with S/MARs.
Key words: Chromatin loop, Loop anchor, S/MAR, FISH, Gene expression, Chromosome structure
Related articles in JCS:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Majumder, J. A. Gomez, B. P. Chadwick, and J. M. Boss The insulator factor CTCF controls MHC class II gene expression and is required for the formation of long-distance chromatin interactions J. Exp. Med., April 14, 2008; 205(4): 785 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M.P. Lufino, R. Manservigi, and R. Wade-Martins An S/MAR-based infectious episomal genomic DNA expression vector provides long-term regulated functional complementation of LDLR deficiency Nucleic Acids Res., August 2, 2007; (2007) gkm570v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Codrington, B. F. Hales, and B. Robaire Chronic Cyclophosphamide Exposure Alters the Profile of Rat Sperm Nuclear Matrix Proteins Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Petrov, I. Pirozhkova, G. Carnac, D. Laoudj, M. Lipinski, and Y. S. Vassetzky Chromatin loop domain organization within the 4q35 locus in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy patients versus normal human myoblasts PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6982 - 6987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Iarovaia, S. B. Akopov, L. G. Nikolaev, E. D. Sverdlov, and S. V. Razin Induction of transcription within chromosomal DNA loops flanked by MAR elements causes an association of loop DNA with the nuclear matrix Nucleic Acids Res., July 26, 2005; 33(13): 4157 - 4163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goetze, A. Baer, S. Winkelmann, K. Nehlsen, J. Seibler, K. Maass, and J. Bode Performance of Genomic Bordering Elements at Predefined Genomic Loci Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2260 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lechardeur, M. Xu, and G. L. Lukacs Contrasting nuclear dynamics of the caspase-activated DNase (CAD) in dividing and apoptotic cells J. Cell Biol., December 6, 2004; 167(5): 851 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||