spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 9 August 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02511

Journal of Cell Science 118, 3925-3936 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jcs.02511v1
118/17/3925    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Perris, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertani, N.
Right arrow Articles by Perris, R.

Research Article

Neurogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells revisited: analysis by immunostaining, time-lapse video and microarray

Nicoletta Bertani1,{ddagger}, Paolo Malatesta1,*,{ddagger},§, Giorgia Volpi1, Paolo Sonego2 and Roberto Perris1,2

1 Department of Evolutionary and Functional Biology, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 11/a, 43100 Parma, Italy
2 Division for Experimental Oncology 2, The National Cancer Institute, CRO-IRCCS, Via Pedemontana Occidentale 1, Aviano 33081, Italy

§ Author for correspondence (e-mail: paolo.malatesta{at}istge.it)

Accepted 25 May 2005

The possibility of generating neural cells from human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) by simple in vitro treatments is appealing both conceptually and practically. However, whether phenotypic modulations observed after chemical manipulation of such stem cells truly represent a genuine trans-lineage differentiation remains to be established. We have re-evaluated the effects of a frequently reported biochemical approach, based on treatment with butylated hydroxyanisole and dimethylsulphoxide, to bring about such phenotypic conversion by monitoring the morphological changes induced by the treatment in real time, by analysing the expression of phenotype-specific protein markers and by assessing the modulation of transcriptome. Video time-lapse microscopy showed that conversion of mesenchymal stem cells to a neuron-like morphology could be reproduced in normal primary fibroblasts as well as mimicked by addition of drugs eliciting cytoskeletal collapse and disruption of focal adhesion contacts. Analysis of markers revealed that mesenchymal stem cells constitutively expressed multi-lineage traits, including several pertaining to the neural one. However, the applied `neural induction' protocol neither significantly modulated the expression of such markers, nor induced de novo translation of other neural-specific proteins. Similarly, global expression profiling of over 21,000 genes demonstrated that gene transcription was poorly affected. Most strikingly, we found that the set of genes whose expression was altered by the inductive treatment did not match those sets of genes differentially expressed when comparing untreated mesenchymal stem cells and immature neural tissues. Conversely, by comparing these gene expression profiles with that obtained from comparisons between the same cells and an unrelated non-neural organ, such as liver, we found that the adopted neural induction protocol was no more effective in redirecting human mesenchymal stem cells toward a neural phenotype than toward an endodermal hepatic pathway.

Key words: Bone-marrow-derived stem cells, Neurogenesis, Transdifferentiation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Miyagawa, H. Okita, H. Nakaijima, Y. Horiuchi, B. Sato, T. Taguchi, M. Toyoda, Y. U. Katagiri, J. Fujimoto, J.-i. Hata, et al.
Inducible Expression of Chimeric EWS/ETS Proteins Confers Ewing's Family Tumor-Like Phenotypes to Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(7): 2125 - 2137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
X. Bai, J. Ma, Z. Pan, Y.-H. Song, S. Freyberg, Y. Yan, D. Vykoukal, and E. Alt
Electrophysiological properties of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): C1539 - C1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Stem CellsHome page
D. G. Phinney and D. J. Prockop
Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem/Multipotent Stromal Cells: The State of Transdifferentiation and Modes of Tissue Repair Current Views
Stem Cells, November 1, 2007; 25(11): 2896 - 2902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Stem CellsHome page
A. P. Croft and S. A. Przyborski
Formation of neurons by non-neural adult stem cells: potential mechanism implicates an artifact of growth in culture.
Stem Cells, August 1, 2006; 24(8): 1841 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. Pacary, H. Legros, S. Valable, P. Duchatelle, M. Lecocq, E. Petit, O. Nicole, and M. Bernaudin
Synergistic effects of CoCl2 and ROCK inhibition on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into neuron-like cells
J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2006; 119(13): 2667 - 2678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005