QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 16 August 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02517

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jcs.02517v1 118/17/3937    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Röper, K. Articles by Brown, N. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Röper, K. Articles by Brown, N. H.

Contribution of sequence variation in Drosophila actins to their incorporation into actin-based structures in vivo

Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: nb117{at}cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 3 June 2005

Actin is a highly conserved protein important for many cellular functions including motility, contraction in muscles and intracellular transport. Many eukaryotic genomes encode multiple actin protein isoforms that differ from each other by only a few residues. We addressed whether the sequence differences between actin paralogues in one species affect their ability to integrate into the large variety of structures generated by filamentous actin. We thus ectopically expressed all six Drosophila actins as fusion proteins with green fluorescent protein (GFP) in a variety of embryonic, larval and adult fly tissues. We found that each actin was able to integrate into most actin structures analysed. For example, in contrast to studies in mammalian cells, the two Drosophila cytoplasmic actins were incorporated into muscle sarcomeres. However, there were differences in the efficiency with which each actin was incorporated into specific actin structures. The most striking difference was observed within the Z-lines of the sarcomeres: one actin was specifically excluded and we mapped this feature to one or both of two residues within the C-terminal half of the protein. Thus, in Drosophila, the primary sequence of different actins does affect their ability to incorporate into actin structures, and so specific GFPactins may be used to label certain actin structures particularly well.

Key words: Cytoskeleton, Muscle, Sarcomere, Filopodia, Oogenesis