|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online September 22, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02575
Research Article |
Department of Molecular and Developmental Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sumiko{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp)
Accepted 7 July 2005
Although there have been many studies on the regulation of neurite extension in mouse brain, such a mechanism in neural retina has remained to be clarified. To delineate the role of Wnt signaling in retinal development, we used a retrovirus-vector-mediated expression system to express various mutants forms of Wnt signaling members in E17.5 mouse retinal explant cultures, which are an excellent system to examine retinal development in vitro. Expression of constitutively active ß-catenin or Lef-1 in the retinal cells resulted in failure of neurite extension, suggesting that ß-catenin negatively regulates neurite extension in the retina through Lef-1 transcriptional activity. However, proliferation and differentiation of retinal cells into mature retinal cells such as rod-photoreceptor cells and Muller glia cells were not affected by perturbation of the Wnt-Lef-1 pathway. As in retinal cells, activation of ß-catenin-Lef-1 signaling inhibited NGF-induced neurite extension in PC12 cells without affecting their proliferation. Interestingly, the Wnt-Lef-1 signaling pathway suppressed neurite extension without affecting Mek-1 signal activity, which is known to promote neurite extension. We found that MAPK was activated in retinal explant cultures, but that perturbation of MAPK signals did not affect neurite extension. Taken together, our data suggest that the Wnt pathway functions in proper neurite extension by opposing positive signals for promotion of neurite extension that are distinct from those of the MAPK pathway.
Key words: Retina, PC12, Wnt, ß-catenin, Neurite extension
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-p. Lin, Y. Ouchi, S. Satoh, and S. Watanabe Sox2 Plays a Role in the Induction of Amacrine and Muller Glial Cells in Mouse Retinal Progenitor Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fuhrmann, A. N. Riesenberg, A. M. Mathiesen, E. C. Brown, M. L. Vetter, and N. L. Brown Characterization of a Transient TCF/LEF-Responsive Progenitor Population in the Embryonic Mouse Retina Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 432 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Koso, A. Iida, Y. Tabata, Y. Baba, S. Satoh, M. M. Taketo, and S. Watanabe CD138/Syndecan-1 and SSEA-1 Mark Distinct Populations of Developing Ciliary Epithelium That Are Regulated Differentially by Wnt Signal Stem Cells, December 1, 2008; 26(12): 3162 - 3171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Grigoryan, P. Wend, A. Klaus, and W. Birchmeier Deciphering the function of canonical Wnt signals in development and disease: conditional loss- and gain-of-function mutations of {beta}-catenin in mice Genes & Dev., September 1, 2008; 22(17): 2308 - 2341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Cho and C. L. Cepko Wnt2b/{beta}-catenin-mediated canonical Wnt signaling determines the peripheral fates of the chick eye Development, August 15, 2006; 133(16): 3167 - 3177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||