QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 29 November 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02686

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material A correction has been published All Versions of this Article: jcs.02686v1 118/24/5899    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stanchi, F. Articles by Fässler, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stanchi, F. Articles by Fässler, R.

Consequences of loss of PINCH2 expression in mice

¹ Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Molecular Medicine, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
² Department of Pharmacy, Center for Drug Research, University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: faessler{at}biochem.mpg.de)

Accepted 12 September 2005

PINCH2 belongs, together with PINCH1, to a new family of focal adhesion proteins, the members of which are composed of five LIM domains. PINCH1 and PINCH2 interact, through their first LIM domain, with the integrin-linked kinase and thereby link integrins with several signal transduction pathways. Despite their high similarity, it has been shown that PINCH1 and PINCH2 could exert distinct functions during cell spreading and cell survival. To investigate the function of PINCH2 in vivo, we deleted PINCH2 in mouse using the loxP/Cre system. In contrast to the PINCH1-deficient mice, which die at the peri-implantation stage, PINCH2-null mice are viable, fertile and show no overt phenotype. Histological analysis of tissues that express high levels of PINCH2 such as bladder and kidney revealed no apparent abnormalities, but showed a significant upregulation of PINCH1, suggesting that the two PINCH proteins may have, at least in part, overlapping function in vivo. To further test this possibility, we established PINCH1-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which express neither PINCH1 nor PINCH2. We found that in fibroblasts with a PINCH1/2-null background, PINCH2 is able to rescue the spreading and adhesion defects of mutant fibroblasts to the same extent as PINCH1. Furthermore, we show that the LIM1 domain only of either PINCH1 or PINCH2 can prevent ILK degradation despite their failure to localize to focal adhesions. Altogether these results suggest that PINCH1 and PINCH2 share overlapping functions and operate dependently and independently of their subcellular localization.

Key words: PINCH (Lims), ILK, Integrin, Adhesion, Migration

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Shi, H. Qu, M. Kretzler, and C. Wu Roles of PINCH-2 in regulation of glomerular cell shape change and fibronectin matrix deposition Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): F253 - F263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-V. Wang, L.-W. Chang, K. Brixius, S. A. Wickstrom, E. Montanez, I. Thievessen, M. Schwander, U. Muller, W. Bloch, U. Mayer, et al. Integrin-linked kinase stabilizes myotendinous junctions and protects muscle from stress-induced damage J. Cell Biol., March 5, 2008; 180(5): 1037 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-B. Kim, S.-Y. Lee, S.-K. Ye, and J. W. Lee Epigenetic regulation of integrin-linked kinase expression depending on adhesion of gastric carcinoma cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): C857 - C866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]