|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 29 March 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02306
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Department of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9503, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: l.mullenders{at}lumc.nl)
Accepted 3 February 2005
Chromatid interchanges induced by the DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C (MMC) are over-represented in human chromosomes containing large heterochromatic regions. We found that nearly all exchange breakpoints of chromosome 9 are located within the paracentromeric heterochromatin and over 70% of exchanges involving chromosome 9 are between its homologues. We provide evidence that the required pairing of chromosome 9 heterochromatic regions occurs in G0/G1 and S-phase cells as a result of an active cellular process initiated upon MMC treatment. By contrast, no pairing was observed for a euchromatic paracentromeric region of the equal-sized chromosome 8. The MMC-induced pairing of chromosome 9 heterochromatin is observed in a subset of cells; its percentage closely mimics the frequency of homologous interchanges found at metaphase. Moreover, the absence of pairing in cells derived from XPF patients correlates with an altered spectrum of MMC-induced exchanges. Together, the data suggest that the heterochromatin-specific pairing following MMC treatment reflects the initiation of DNA cross-link repair and the formation of exchanges.
Key words: Chromosome pairing, Chromosome positioning, Cross-link repair, Heterochromatin, MMC, XPF
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-R. Sihn, Y.-S. Lee, J.-S. Jeong, K. Park, and S. H. Kim CANu1, a novel nucleolar protein, accumulated on centromere in response to DNA damage Genes Cells, August 1, 2008; 13(8): 787 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||