|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 25 April 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02945
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |

Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC, Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK
Author for correspondence (e-mail: amanda.fisher{at}csc.mrc.ac.uk)
Accepted 16 February 2006
Although differentiated cells normally retain cell-type-specific gene expression patterns throughout their lifetime, cell identity can sometimes be modified or reversed in vivo by transdifferentiation, or experimentally through cell fusion or by nuclear transfer. To examine the epigenetic changes that are required for the dominant conversion of lymphocytes to muscle, we generated heterokaryons between human B lymphocytes and mouse C2C12 myotubes. We show that within 2 days of heterokaryon formation lymphocyte nuclei adopt an architecture resembling that of muscle and then initiate the expression of muscle-specific genes in the same temporal order as developing muscle. The establishment of this muscle-specific program is coordinated with the shutdown of several lymphocyte-associated genes. Interestingly, erasing lymphocyte identity in reprogrammed cells requires histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. Inhibition of HDAC activity during reprogramming selectively blocks the silencing of lymphocyte-specific genes but does not prevent the establishment of muscle-specific gene expression. Successful reprogramming is therefore shown to be a multi-step process in which the acquisition and extinction of lineage-specific gene programs are separable events.
Key words: Reprogramming, Lymphocytes, Interspecies heterokaryons, Gene silencing
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Biddle, I. Simeoni, and J. B. Gurdon Xenopus oocytes reactivate muscle gene transcription in transplanted somatic nuclei independently of myogenic factors Development, August 15, 2009; 136(16): 2695 - 2703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Palermo, R. Doyonnas, N. Bhutani, J. Pomerantz, O. Alkan, and H. M. Blau Nuclear reprogramming in heterokaryons is rapid, extensive, and bidirectional FASEB J, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 1431 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Pomerantz, S. Mukherjee, A. T. Palermo, and H. M. Blau Reprogramming to a muscle fate by fusion recapitulates differentiation J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2009; 122(7): 1045 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Gurdon and D. A. Melton Nuclear Reprogramming in Cells Science, December 19, 2008; 322(5909): 1811 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zhang, J. H. Pomerantz, G. Sen, A. T. Palermo, and H. M. Blau Active tissue-specific DNA demethylation conferred by somatic cell nuclei in stable heterokaryons PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4395 - 4400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||