|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 27 June 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03017
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, F628, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: roeddy{at}aecom.yu.edu)
Accepted 13 April 2006
It has been demonstrated that the actin-severing activity of cofilin can be downregulated by LIM kinase (LIMK)-dependent phosphorylation at residue Ser3. Chemotactic stimulaton in various cell types induces cofilin dephosphorylation, suggesting that cofilin activation in these cells occurs by a dephosphorylation mechanism. However, resting metastatic carcinoma cells have the majority of their cofilin in a dephosphorylated but largely inactive state. Stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) induces an increase in cofilin activity after 60 seconds together with an increase in phosphorylated cofilin (p-cofilin), indicating that cofilin dephosphorylation is not coupled to cofilin activation in these cells. Suppression of LIMK function by inhibiting Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) or LIMK siRNA inhibited the EGF-induced cofilin phosphorylation but had no effect on cofilin activity or cofilin-dependent lamellipod protrusion induced by EGF. Correlation analysis revealed that cofilin, p-cofilin and LIMK are not colocalized, and changes in the location of these proteins upon stimulation with EGF indicate that they are not functionally coupled. Phospholipase C, which has been implicated in cofilin activation following stimulation with EGF, does not regulate p-cofilin levels following stimulation with EGF. Therefore, our results do not support a model for the initial activation of cofilin by dephosphorylation in response to chemoattractant stimulation in metastatic carcinoma cells.
Key words: LIM kinase, Cofilin-severing, Rho-associated protein kinase
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Kolsch, P. G. Charest, and R. A. Firtel The regulation of cell motility and chemotaxis by phospholipid signaling J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2008; 121(5): 551 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van Rheenen, X. Song, W. van Roosmalen, M. Cammer, X. Chen, V. DesMarais, S.-C. Yip, J. M. Backer, R. J. Eddy, and J. S. Condeelis EGF-induced PIP2 hydrolysis releases and activates cofilin locally in carcinoma cells J. Cell Biol., December 17, 2007; 179(6): 1247 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kligys, J. N. Claiborne, P. J. DeBiase, S. B. Hopkinson, Y. Wu, K. Mizuno, and J. C. R. Jones The Slingshot Family of Phosphatases Mediates Rac1 Regulation of Cofilin Phosphorylation, Laminin-332 Organization, and Motility Behavior of Keratinocytes J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32520 - 32528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Jovceva, M. R. Larsen, M. D. Waterfield, B. Baum, and J. F. Timms Dynamic cofilin phosphorylation in the control of lamellipodial actin homeostasis J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2007; 120(11): 1888 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhou, S. J. Martinez, M. Haber, E. V. Jones, D. Bouvier, G. Doucet, A. T. Corera, E. A. Fon, A. H. Zisch, and K. K. Murai EphA4 Signaling Regulates Phospholipase C{gamma}1 Activation, Cofilin Membrane Association, and Dendritic Spine Morphology J. Neurosci., May 9, 2007; 27(19): 5127 - 5138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||