|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online April 24, 2006
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.02899
Research Article |
1 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL 32011, USA
3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute graduate training program, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
* Authors for correspondence (e-mail: wirtz{at}jhu.edu; jslee{at}jhu.edu)
Accepted 19 January 2006
Cells in vivo are constantly subjected to mechanical shear stresses that play important regulatory roles in various physiological and pathological processes. Cytoskeletal reorganizations that occur in response to shear flow have been studied extensively, but whether the cytoplasm of an adherent cell adapts its mechanical properties to respond to shear is largely unknown. Here we develop a new method where fluorescent nanoparticles are ballistically injected into the cells to probe, with high resolution, possible local viscoelastic changes in the cytoplasm of individual cells subjected to fluid flow. This new assay, ballistic intracellular nanorheology (BIN), reveals that shear flow induces a dramatic sustained 25-fold increase in cytoplasmic viscosity in serum-starved Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. By contrast, cells stimulated with the actin contractile agonist LPA show highly transient stiffening of much lower amplitude, despite the formation of similar cytoskeletal structures. Shear-induced cytoplasmic stiffening is attenuated by inhibiting actomyosin interactions and is entirely eliminated by specific Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibition. Together, these results show that biochemical and biophysical stimuli may elicit the formation of qualitatively similar cytoskeleton structures (i.e. stress fibers and focal adhesions), but induces quantitatively different micromechanical responses. Our results suggest that when an adherent cell is subjected to shear stresses, its first order of action is to prevent detachment from its substratum by greatly stiffening its cytoplasm through enhanced actin assembly and Rho-kinase mediated contractility.
Key words: Cell mechanics, Rho GTPases, Fluid shear stress, Actin, Microtubule
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. del Alamo, G. N. Norwich, Y.-s. J. Li, J. C. Lasheras, and S. Chien Anisotropic rheology and directional mechanotransduction in vascular endothelial cells PNAS, October 7, 2008; 105(40): 15411 - 15416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Jackson, M. J. Jaasma, R. Y. Tang, and T. M. Keaveny Mechanical loading by fluid shear is sufficient to alter the cytoskeletal composition of osteoblastic cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): C1007 - C1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou, R. G. Rowe, N. Hiraoka, J. P. George, D. Wirtz, D. F. Mosher, I. Virtanen, M. A. Chernousov, and S. J. Weiss Fibronectin fibrillogenesis regulates three-dimensional neovessel formation Genes & Dev., May 1, 2008; 22(9): 1231 - 1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Dangaria and P. J. Butler Macrorheology and adaptive microrheology of endothelial cells subjected to fluid shear stress Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): C1568 - C1575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||