|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online July 23, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.004523
Research Article |



1 Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Radiation Oncology, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4 Department of Reproduction and Development, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Authors for correspondence (e-mails: a.houtsmuller{at}erasmusmc.nl; w.vermeulen{at}erasmusmc.nl)
Accepted 30 May 2007
Live cell studies of DNA repair mechanisms are greatly enhanced by new developments in real-time visualization of repair factors in living cells. Combined with recent advances in local sub-nuclear DNA damage induction procedures these methods have yielded detailed information on the dynamics of damage recognition and repair. Here we analyze and discuss the various types of DNA damage induced in cells by three different local damage induction methods: pulsed 800 nm laser irradiation, Hoechst 33342 treatment combined with 405 nm laser irradiation and UV-C (266 nm) laser irradiation. A wide variety of damage was detected with the first two methods, including pyrimidine dimers and single- and double-strand breaks. However, many aspects of the cellular response to presensitization by Hoechst 33342 and subsequent 405 nm irradiation were aberrant from those to every other DNA damaging method described here or in the literature. Whereas, application of low-dose 266 nm laser irradiation induced only UV-specific DNA photo-lesions allowing the study of the UV-C-induced DNA damage response in a user-defined area in cultured cells.
Key words: Pyrimidine dimers, Local DNA damage induction, Double-strand breaks, Living cells, DNA repair kinetics
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Trautlein, M. Deibler, A. Leitenstorfer, and E. Ferrando-May Specific local induction of DNA strand breaks by infrared multi-photon absorption Nucleic Acids Res., November 11, 2009; (2009) gkp932v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Muniandy, D. Thapa, A. K. Thazhathveetil, S.-t. Liu, and M. M. Seidman Repair of Laser-localized DNA Interstrand Cross-links in G1 Phase Mammalian Cells J. Biol. Chem., October 9, 2009; 284(41): 27908 - 27917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Marteijn, S. Bekker-Jensen, N. Mailand, H. Lans, P. Schwertman, A. M. Gourdin, N. P. Dantuma, J. Lukas, and W. Vermeulen Nucleotide excision repair-induced H2A ubiquitination is dependent on MDC1 and RNF8 and reveals a universal DNA damage response J. Cell Biol., September 21, 2009; 186(6): 835 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Luijsterburg, C. Dinant, H. Lans, J. Stap, E. Wiernasz, S. Lagerwerf, D. O. Warmerdam, M. Lindh, M. C. Brink, J. W. Dobrucki, et al. Heterochromatin protein 1 is recruited to various types of DNA damage J. Cell Biol., May 18, 2009; 185(4): 577 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hoogstraten, S. Bergink, J. M. Y. Ng, V. H. M. Verbiest, M. S. Luijsterburg, B. Geverts, A. Raams, C. Dinant, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, W. Vermeulen, et al. Versatile DNA damage detection by the global genome nucleotide excision repair protein XPC J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2008; 121(17): 2850 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||