|
|
![]() |
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online August 9, 2007
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.001404
Research Article |
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
e-mails: d.abankwa{at}imb.uq.edu.au; horst.vogel{at}epfl.ch
Accepted 21 June 2007
The standard model of heterotrimeric G protein signaling postulates a dissociation of G
and G
subunits after activation. We hypothesized that the different combination of lipid-modifications on G
and G

subunits directs them into different microdomains. By characterizing rapidly and at high sensitivity 38 fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) pairs of heterotrimeric-G-protein constructs, we defined their microdomains in relation to each other, free from the constraints of the raft/non-raft dualism. We estimated that in a cell
30% of these membrane-anchored proteins are mostly clustered in 3400-16,200 copies of 30-nm microdomains. We found that the membrane anchors of G
and G

subunits of both the Gi/o and Gq family co-cluster differently with microdomain markers. Moreover, anchors of the G
i/o and G
q subunits co-clustered only weakly, whereas constructs that contained the anchors of the corresponding heterotrimers co-clustered considerably, suggesting the existence of at least three types of microdomain. Finally, FRET experiments with full-length heterotrimeric G proteins confirmed that the inactive, heterotrimerized G
subunit is in microdomains shared by heterotrimers from different subclasses, from where it displaces upon activation into a membrane-anchor- and subclass-specific microdomain.
Key words: FRET, Heterotrimeric G protein, Microdomain, Nanodomain, Raft
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?