QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 16 January 2007
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03341

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: jcs.03341v1 120/3/502    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Williams, M. J. Articles by Hultmark, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Williams, M. J. Articles by Hultmark, D.

Reciprocal regulation of Rac1 and Rho1 in Drosophila circulating immune surveillance cells

Umeå Centre for Molecular Pathogenesis (UCMP), Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: michael.williams{at}ucmp.umu.se)

Accepted 14 November 2006

In many cell types it is evident that the small GTPases Rac and Rho regulate each other's activities. What is unclear is exactly how this regulation occurs. To further elucidate this interaction we examined the activities of Rac1 and Rho1 in Drosophila cellular immune surveillance cells. In larvae the cellular immune response involves circulating cells (hemocytes) that can be recruited from a hematopoietic organ located behind the brain, as well as a sessile population found just underneath the larval cuticle. We demonstrate for the first time that Rho-kinase activation requires both Rho1 and the Drosophila c-Jun N-terminal kinase (Basket). We also show that Rac1, via Basket, regulates Rho1 activity, possibly by inhibiting RhoGAPp190. In the reciprocal pathway, co-expression of dominant negative Rho-kinase and constitutive active Rho1 induces a Rac1-like phenotype. This induction requires the formin Diaphanous. Co-expression of dominant negative Rho-kinase and constitutive active Rho1 also induces filopodia formation, with Diaphanous enriched at the tips. The Rac1-like phenotypes, and filopodia formation, could be blocked by co-expression of dominant negative Rac1. Finally, though dominant negative Rac1 is able to block filopodia formation in the overexpression experiments, only Rac2 is necessary for filopodia formed by hemocytes after parasitization.

Key words: Rho GTPase, Hemocytes, Innate immunity, Parasitization

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Mulinari, M. P. Barmchi, and U. Hacker DRhoGEF2 and Diaphanous Regulate Contractile Force during Segmental Groove Morphogenesis in the Drosophila Embryo Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 1883 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Avet-Rochex, J. Perrin, E. Bergeret, and M.-O. Fauvarque Rac2 is a major actor of Drosophila resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa acting in phagocytic cells Genes Cells, October 1, 2007; 12(10): 1193 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]