QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online July 23, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.024943

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JCS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tonge, D. Articles by Pizzey, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tonge, D. Articles by Pizzey, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Enhancement of axonal regeneration by in vitro conditioning and its inhibition by cyclopentenone prostaglandins

¹ School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
² Genomics Center, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK
³ MRC Centre for Neurodegeneration Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
⁴ Proteome Sciences plc, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: david.tonge{at}kcl.ac.uk)

Accepted 12 May 2008

Axonal regeneration is enhanced by the prior `conditioning' of peripheral nerve lesions. Here we show that Xenopus dorsal root ganglia (DRG) with attached peripheral nerves (PN-DRG) can be conditioned in vitro, thereafter showing enhanced neurotrophin-induced axonal growth similar to preparations conditioned by axotomy in vivo. Actinomycin D inhibits axonal outgrowth from freshly dissected PN-DRG, but not from conditioned preparations. Synthesis of mRNAs that encode proteins necessary for axonal elongation might therefore occur during the conditioning period, a suggestion that was confirmed by oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Culturing PN-DRG in a compartmentalized system showed that inhibition of protein synthesis (but not RNA synthesis) in the distal nerve impaired the conditioning response, suggesting that changes in gene expression in cultured DRG depend on the synthesis and retrograde transport of protein(s) in peripheral nerves. The culture system was also used to demonstrate retrograde axonal transport of several proteins, including thioredoxin (Trx). Cyclopentenone prostaglandins, which react with Trx, blocked the in vitro conditioning effect, whereas inhibition of other signalling pathways thought to be involved in axonal regeneration did not. This suggests that Trx and/or other targets of these electrophilic prostaglandins regulate axonal regeneration. Consistent with this hypothesis, morpholino-induced suppression of Trx expression in dissociated DRG neurons was associated with reduced neurite outgrowth.

Key words: Axonal regeneration, Axonal transport, Mass spectrometry, Microarray analysis, Neurotrophin, Prostaglandin

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JCS:

Thioredoxin takes on the axon

JCS 2008 121: 1505. [Full Text]