QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online August 6, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.031120

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bretscher, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bretscher, M. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On the shape of migrating cells — a `front-to-back' model

MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK

Author for correspondence (e-mail: msb{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 25 June 2008

The wide range of shapes that are seen in stationary animal cells is believed to be the result of an interplay between giant filamentous complexes – largely the microfilaments and microtubules – although how this is achieved is unknown. In a migrating cell these large elements are also important, but here I suggest an additional factor: the cell surface distribution of those molecules that attach the cell to the substratum. As an animal cell advances, the attachments it makes with the substratum necessarily move backwards with respect to the cell. A fresh supply of these attachments – usually integrin molecules – is required at the cell front so that new attachments can be made. This supply is believed to be provided by the endocytic cycle, which enables the collection of integrins and other molecules from elsewhere on the surface of the cell to be recirculated to the front end of the cell. The rate at which a particular integrin cycles will determine its distribution on the ventral surface of the cell and this, in turn, might help to determine the shape of the cell. I also propose that adhesion molecules that have a slow rate of cycling will produce a flattish phenotype, as seen in fibroblasts, whereas a more rapid cycling will lead to a more snail-like shape. In addition, this model suggests why membrane ruffling occurs and that large non-circulating surface molecules move towards the back of the cell where they might assist in detaching the back end of the cell.

Key words: Cell shape, Integrin, Cytoskeleton, Membrane recycling, Leading lamella, Endocytosis, Exocytosis, Fibroblast, Front-to-back model

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Poincloux, F. Lizarraga, and P. Chavrier Matrix invasion by tumour cells: a focus on MT1-MMP trafficking to invadopodia J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2009; 122(17): 3015 - 3024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]