spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online August 20, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.023465


Journal of Cell Science 121, 2783-2793 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fish, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Huttner, W. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fish, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Huttner, W. B.

Commentary

Making bigger brains–the evolution of neural-progenitor-cell division

Jennifer L. Fish1,*,{ddagger}, Colette Dehay2,3, Henry Kennedy2,3 and Wieland B. Huttner1,{ddagger}

1 Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
2 Inserm, U846, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, 69500 Bron, France
3 Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 69003, Lyon, France

{ddagger} Authors for correspondence (e-mail: jennifer.fish{at}kcl.ac.uk; huttner{at}mpi-cbg.de)

Accepted 15 July 2008

Relative brain size differs markedly between species. This variation might ultimately result from differences in the cell biology of neural progenitors, which might underlie their different proliferative potential. On the basis of the cell-biological properties of neural progenitors of animals of varying brain size and complexity (namely, Drosophila melanogaster, rodents and primates), we hypothesize that the evolution of four related cell-biological features has contributed to increases in neuron number. Three of these features–the pseudostratification of the progenitor layer, the loss of (Inscuteable-mediated) mitotic-spindle rotation and the evolution of proteins (such as Aspm) that maintain the precision of symmetric progenitor division–affect the mode of cell division in the apically dividing progenitors of the ventricular zone. The fourth feature, however, concerns the evolution of the basally dividing progenitors of the subventricular zone. In rodents, these basal (or intermediate) progenitors lack cell polarity, whereas in primates a subpopulation of radial, presumably polarized, progenitors has evolved (outer-subventricular-zone progenitors). These cells undergo basal mitoses and are thought to retain epithelial characteristics. We propose the epithelial-progenitor hypothesis, which argues that evolutionary changes that promote the maintenance of epithelial features in neural progenitors, including outer-subventricular-zone progenitors, have been instrumental in the expansion of the cerebral cortex in primates.

Key words: Brain size, Cerebral cortex, Neural stem and progenitor cells, Neurogenesis, Radial glia, Symmetric and asymmetric cell division







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008