QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online December 31, 2008
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.018556

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Askari, J. A. Articles by Humphries, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Askari, J. A. Articles by Humphries, M. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Linking integrin conformation to function

Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: martin.humphries{at}manchester.ac.uk)

Integrins are β heterodimeric adhesion receptors that relay signals bidirectionally across the plasma membrane between the extracellular matrix and cell-surface ligands, and cytoskeletal and signalling effectors. The physical and chemical signals that are controlled by integrins are essential for intercellular communication and underpin all aspects of metazoan existence. To mediate such diverse functions, integrins exhibit structural diversity, flexibility and dynamism. Conformational changes, as opposed to surface expression or clustering, are central to the regulation of receptor function. In recent years, there has been intense interest in determining the three-dimensional structure of integrins, and analysing the shape changes that underpin the interconversion between functional states. Considering the central importance of the integrin signalling nexus, it is perhaps no surprise that obtaining this information has been difficult, and the answers gained so far have been complicated. In this Commentary, we pose some of the key remaining questions that surround integrin structure-function relationships and review the evidence that supports the current models.

Key words: Function, Integrins, Structure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bass, L. Wagstaff, L. Ravenhill, and V. Ellis Binding of Extracellular Maspin to {beta}1 Integrins Inhibits Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Migration J. Biol. Chem., October 2, 2009; 284(40): 27712 - 27720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Manevich-Mendelson, S. W. Feigelson, R. Pasvolsky, M. Aker, V. Grabovsky, Z. Shulman, S. S. Kilic, M. A. Rosenthal-Allieri, S. Ben-Dor, A. Mory, et al. Loss of Kindlin-3 in LAD-III eliminates LFA-1 but not VLA-4 adhesiveness developed under shear flow conditions Blood, September 10, 2009; 114(11): 2344 - 2353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Julich, A. P. Mould, E. Koper, and S. A. Holley Control of extracellular matrix assembly along tissue boundaries via Integrin and Eph/Ephrin signaling Development, September 1, 2009; 136(17): 2913 - 2921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Chigaev, A. Waller, O. Amit, L. Halip, C. G. Bologa, and L. A. Sklar Real-time Analysis of Conformation-sensitive Antibody Binding Provides New Insights into Integrin Conformational Regulation J. Biol. Chem., May 22, 2009; 284(21): 14337 - 14346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]