spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 18, 2009
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.037382


Journal of Cell Science 122, 735-744 (2009)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2009
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wozny, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wozny, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ivanovic, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Article

The function of glutamatergic synapses is not perturbed by severe knockdown of 4.1N and 4.1G expression

Christian Wozny1,*,{ddagger},§, Jörg Breustedt1,*, Friederike Wolk2,*, Frédérique Varoqueaux2, Susann Boretius3, Aleksandar R. Zivkovic1, Antje Neeb4, Jens Frahm3, Dietmar Schmitz1, Nils Brose2 and Aleksandra Ivanovic2,{ddagger}

1 Neuroscience Research Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
2 Max-Planck-Institut für Experimentelle Medizin, Abteilung Molekulare Neurobiologie, DFG Center for Molecular Physiology of the Brain, Hermann-Rein-Str. 3, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany
3 Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
4 Institut für Toxikologie und Genetik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

{ddagger} Authors for correspondence (e-mails: ivanovic{at}em.mpg.de; cwozny{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk)

Accepted 6 November 2008

AMPA-type glutamate receptors mediate fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the vertebrate brain. Their surface expression at synapses between neurons is regulated in an activity-dependent and activity-independent manner. The protein machinery that regulates synaptic targeting, anchoring and turnover of AMPA receptors consists of several types of specialized scaffolding proteins. The FERM domain scaffolding proteins 4.1G and 4.1N were previously suggested to act jointly in binding and regulating synaptic trafficking of the AMPA receptor subunits GluR1 and GluR4. To determine the functions of 4.1G and 4.1N in vivo, we generated a mutant mouse line that lacks 4.1G entirely and expresses 4.1N at 22% of wild-type levels. These mice had combined 4.1G and 4.1N protein expression in the hippocampus at 12% of wild-type levels (equivalent to 8-10% of combined GluR1 and GluR4 expression levels). They show a moderate reduction in synaptosomal expression levels of the AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 at 3 weeks of age, but no change in basic glutamatergic synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Our study indicates that 4.1G and 4.1N do not have a crucial role in glutamatergic synaptic transmission and the induction and maintenance of long-term plastic changes in synaptic efficacy.

Key words: Knockout, Mouse, Hippocampus, GluR1, GluR4, Synaptic plasticity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2009