spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHIN, S.-I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHIN, S.-I.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 14, 235-251, Copyright © 1974 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on June 27, 1973

Nature of Mutations Conferring Resistance to 8-Azaguanine in Mouse Cell Lines

SEUNG-IL SHIN 1

1 Basel Institute for Immunology, Grenzacherstrasse 487, 4058 Basel, Switzerland, and Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, U.S.A.

Two stable mouse cell mutants A9 and RAG, which are resistant to 8-azaguanine and deficient in hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT), have been studied in order to establish the nature of molecular changes conferring the mutant phenotypes. A specific precipitating rabbit antiserum was prepared against the normal HGPRT purified from mouse tissues, and used to test for cross-reacting material (CRM) in the mutant lysates. Neither mutants contained detectable cross-reacting material, as demonstrated by precipitation in-hibition tests. However, the L cell-derived mutant A9 was shown to have a low but significant level of HGPRT activity which was clearly different from that of the normal enzyme in the wild-type parental cell line. Compared to the wild-type enzyme, the HGPRT in A9 is extremely heat labile, and has an elevated substrate-binding constant in addition to distinct antigenic differences. Both A9 and RAG have been shown previously to revert to the normal phenotype with low frequency, thus ruling out gene deletions as a possible cause of the 8-azaguanine resistance. It is suggested that RAG could involve a recessive regulatory mutation, while A9 may contain a structurally altered HGPRT as a result of a missense mutation within the structural gene for this enzyme.

Note:

Address to which requests for reprints should be sent.

Submitted on June 27, 1973







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1974