spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OCKLEFORD, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OCKLEFORD, C. D.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 16, 499-517, Copyright © 1974 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on May 6, 1974

Cytokinesis in the Heliozoan Actinophrys Sol

C. D. OCKLEFORD 1

1 Department of Zoology, The University, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland and Institut für Biologie 3 der Universität, 74 Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, German Federal Republic

A study of cytokinesis in the heliozoan Actinophrys sol has been made using low-temperature treatments, antimitotic drugs, cytochalasin B, light microscopy and electron microscopy. It reveals that microtubular axopodia remain extended during cell division and play a major role in it.

Data indicate that when organisms are attached to the bases of culture dishes the normal locomotive mechanism of the presumptive daughter cells pulls them apart. However, when Actinophrys are floating freely in their culture medium, they are still able to undertake division. In this situation interactions between axopodia from opposite daughter cell bodies appear to facilitate the movement apart of the prospective daughter cells.

The present study and other published accounts indicate that a type of cytokinesis exists which is not explicable in terms of the ‘contractile ring’ or ‘fusing vesicle’ theories. To account for these observations a ‘barge pole’ model of division is suggested.

Note:

Address to which reprint requests should be sent: Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, England.

Submitted on May 6, 1974







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1974