spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roland, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roland, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, D.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 19, Issue 2 239-259, Copyright © 1975 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Observations with cytochemistry and ultracryotomy on the fine structure of the expanding walls in actively elongating plant cells

JC Roland, B Vian and D Reis

Ultracryotomy with negative staining and cytochemistry (periodic acid - thiocarbohydrazide - silver proteinate test for polysaccharides, in conjunction with mild extractions) were used to study the architecture of the cell wall and its modifications during expansion. Those techniques were applied to the study in situ of the walls of actively elongating parenchyma of mung bean (Phaseolus aureus), and pea (Pisum sativum) root and of collenchyma of celery (Apium graveolens) petioles. These complementary techniques provide information on the 3-dimensional disposition and fine structure of the subunits of the wall. In all the examples examined, the bulk of growing primary wall appears well-ordered and no progressive evolution from a transverse texture near the plasmalemma to a scattered texture near the middle lamella was observed. It seems unlikely that the development of the wall structure in relation to growth could be explained mechanically by a passive shift of the fibrillar elements in response to cellular stress. There is no evidence for an inert change in fibrillar orientation in the major part of the wall. If such occurs the process is limited to the outermost and senescent part of the wall. Thus, the texture observed does not agree with the classical multinet growth hypothesis but rather with the idea of an ordered structure of the primary wall. With the latter, the components should be able to respond in different ways to specific growth regulators and other environmental signals and thus exert a more positive control over the processes of oriented cell growth.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1975