spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, A. M.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 22, Issue 1 115-131, Copyright © 1976 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Spindle birefringence of isolated mitotic apparatus: further evidence for two birefringent spindle components

A Forer, VI Kalnins and AM Zimmerman

We studied sea-urchin zygote mitotic apparatus (MA) isolated in hexylene glycol, transferred immediately to a glycerol-dimethylsulphoxide medium, and stored for 2 weeks at room temperature. Treatment with 0-5 M KC1 caused loss of 45% of the birefringence, but microtubules remained intact (as seen electron microscopically in glutaraldehyde-fixed MA), and tubulin was not extracted (as determined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). These results suggest that a non-tubulin component which is extracted by the KC1 contributes 45% of the MA birefringence. Further evidence for this conclusion came from indirect immunofluorescence experiments. Non-extracted (control) MA were fixed with formaldehyde and reacted with antibody against tubulin; there was intense staining of the spindle fibres and astral rays. Electron microscopically, however, microtubules were not present in formaldehyde-fixed MA. Since formaldehyde fixation caused breakdown of microtubules but the tubulin remained in the MA (as judged by reaction with antibodies) we suggest that after microtubule breakdown the tubulin remains in the MA because it is bound to a peri-microtubule spindle component (which we call 'substance gamma'). When KCl-extracted MA were fixed with formaldehyde and reacted with antibody against tubulin there was very little staining of spindle fibres and astral rays. Electron microscopically, formaldehyde caused microtubule breakdown, and since the tubulin is lost from formaldehydefixed, KC1-extracted MA (as judged by reaction with antibodies), we suggest that the tubulin-binding component, substance gamma, is extracted by the 0-5 M KC1. Pressure treatment caused the asters not to stain with antibody against tubulin, suggesting that the stability of substance gamma is different in different regions of the mitotic apparatus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. S. Tirnauer, E. D. Salmon, and T. J. Mitchison
Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics in Xenopus Egg Extract Spindles
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2004; 15(4): 1776 - 1784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1976