spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEINHARDT, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MEINHARDT, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 23, 117-139, Copyright © 1977 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on June 3, 1976

A Model of Pattern Formation in Insect Embryogenesis

H. MEINHARDT 1

1 Max-Planck-Institut für Virusforschung, 74 Tubingen, Germany

A model is proposed in which the interaction of an autocatalytic substance with a short diffusion range - the activator - and its more diffusible antagonist - the inhibitor - leads to a local high concentration of activator at the posterior pole of the egg. The inhibitor, which is then produced mainly in this activated region, diffuses into the rest of the egg, where it acts as a ‘morphogen’, forming a concentration gradient which supplies positional information.

This model can account quantitatively for the patterns resulting from a large number of different experiments performed during early insect development, including ligation, u.v.-irradiation and microsurgical manipulations. The formation of additional posterior structures is interpreted as the result of the appearance of a new activator peak. Omission of segments after ligation of the egg is explained as the result of accumulation of morphogen (the inhibitor) at the posterior side of the ligation and a decrease of morphogen on the anterior side. In order to account for certain quantitative features of the ligation experiments it is necessary to assume that determination in response to the morphogen gradient is a slow, stepwise process, in which the nuclei or cells first pass through determination stages characteristic for more anterior structures until they ultimately form a given structure.

The mutual interactions of activator and inhibitor are expressed as a set of partial differential equations. The individual experiments are simulated by solving these equations by use of a computer.

Submitted on June 3, 1976


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S. Spencer, P. Powell, D. Miller, and R. Cagan
Regulation of EGF receptor signaling establishes pattern across the developing Drosophila retina
Development, January 12, 1998; 125(23): 4777 - 4790.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C Nusslein-Volhard, H. Frohnhofer, and R Lehmann
Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila
Science, December 18, 1987; 238(4834): 1675 - 1681.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. Gehring
Homeo boxes in the study of development
Science, June 5, 1987; 236(4806): 1245 - 1252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Kauffman, R. Shymko, and K Trabert
Control of sequential compartment formation in Drosophila
Science, January 20, 1978; 199(4326): 259 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1977