|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 3, 231-244, Copyright © 1968 by Company of Biologists
Submitted on July 8, 1967
1 Department of Biology, Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.; Cell Biology Program, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55101, U.S.A.
Analysis of ciné records indicates that the locomotion of Actinosphaerium eichhorni and Actinophrys sp. includes a definite rolling motion, in addition to evident horizontal and vertical displacements. Such movements could be correlated with significant changes in the lengths of supportive axopods, but not with axopodial rowing or sliding movements. The data also do not support a model of locomotion based simply on those systematic shifts in the cell's centre of gravity that would be caused by sequential collapse of supportive axopods. Although active bending of attached axopods cannot be discounted, locomotion would seem to result from forces generated between the cytosome and substratum by attached axopods undergoing changes in length. The observations suggest, moreover, that axopodial retraction is more important than elongation in the generation of motive force.
It is proposed that the relative magnitude of each locomotory component is determined by the dimensional parameters of the particular species. As a consequence, changes in axopodial length can account for both the rolling and gliding behaviour reported in the literature.
Submitted on July 8, 1967