spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATTERS, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WATTERS, C.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 3, 231-244, Copyright © 1968 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on July 8, 1967

Studies on the Motility of the Heliozoa

I. The Locomotion of Actinosphaerium Eichhorni and Actinophrys Sp.

C. WATTERS 1

1 Department of Biology, Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A.; Cell Biology Program, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota 55101, U.S.A.

Analysis of ciné records indicates that the locomotion of Actinosphaerium eichhorni and Actinophrys sp. includes a definite rolling motion, in addition to evident horizontal and vertical displacements. Such movements could be correlated with significant changes in the lengths of supportive axopods, but not with axopodial rowing or sliding movements. The data also do not support a model of locomotion based simply on those systematic shifts in the cell's centre of gravity that would be caused by sequential collapse of supportive axopods. Although active bending of attached axopods cannot be discounted, locomotion would seem to result from forces generated between the cytosome and substratum by attached axopods undergoing changes in length. The observations suggest, moreover, that axopodial retraction is more important than elongation in the generation of motive force.

It is proposed that the relative magnitude of each locomotory component is determined by the dimensional parameters of the particular species. As a consequence, changes in axopodial length can account for both the ‘rolling’ and ‘gliding’ behaviour reported in the literature.

Submitted on July 8, 1967







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1968