spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tickle, C.
Right arrow Articles by Crawley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tickle, C.
Right arrow Articles by Crawley, A.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 40, Issue 1 257-270, Copyright © 1979 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Infiltration and survival: the behaviour of normal, invasive cells implanted to the developing chick wing

C Tickle and A Crawley

The invasiveness of mouse lymphocytes and thymocytes, rabbit peritoneal neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs), mouse peritoneal macrophages (both activated and non-activated) and pig endothelial cells was assayed by implanting these cells to the chick wing bud. Cells of each type moved into the wing mesenchyme, although activated macrophages invaded poorly. PMNs were the most invasive cells and had moved well into the limb after only a few hours. PMNs, lymphocytes and thymocytes were ingested by wing mesenchyme cells. Endothelial cells, however, ingested chick blood cells. The implanted cells showed differences in ability to survive in the limb: PMNs disappeared rapidly, lymphocytes and thymocytes sometimes persisted for 24 h, while grafts of macrophages and endothelial cells were present at 24 h. Mechanisms which might be involved in the invasiveness of these cells, and also in their different abilities to survive in the chick wing, are discussed with particular reference to the production of plasminogen activator.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1979