spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pay, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pay, G. F.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 41, Issue 1 263-272, Copyright © 1980 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The effects of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde fixation on the retention and subcellular location of [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine in rabbit platelets: a study using liquid scintillation counting and E.M. autoradiography

JR Baker and GF Pay

The retention and loss of [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) from rabbit platelets during fixation was studied using liquid scintillation counting and quantitative electron-microscopic autoradiography. The results were at variance with previously reported data on human platelets. Following treatment of the platelets with either 2.0% formaldehyde or 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 min or 1 h it was found that a significantly increased proportion of the radioactivity was lost from treated as compared with untreated platelets. Using a method of analysis which accounts for cross-scatter of decay particles between cell compartments, electron-microscopic autoradiography revealed that 50% of the radioactivity following incubation of platelets with [3H]5-HT was associated with dense bodies and 30% in the cytoplasm when fixation was in formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde. The only major difference in the labelling pattern was that whereas glutaraldehyde appeared to retain no activity in the surface connected system the latter contained 12% of total retained activity following fixation with formaldehyde.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1980