Journal of Cell Science, Vol 44, Issue 1 201-223, Copyright © 1980 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Locomotion and cell-substratum contacts of Xenopus epidermal cells in vitro and in situ

GP Radice

Studies of tissue cell locomotion in culture have revealed much about cell motility, but whether behaviour in vitro resembles movement of the same cells in the animal is not clear. To investigate this, I compared the locomotion and cell-substratum contacts of epidermal cells from Xenopus tadpoles, migrating from explants on glass and plastic, with the same cells spreading in vivo during wound closure. Time-lapse cinemicrography showed that in both cases, cells spread by extending broad lamellipodia across the substratum, and did not form microspikes, filopodia, or blebs. The net rate of translocation was significantly slower in vitro, however, because cells both protruded lamellipodia slower and spent more time stationary or withdrawing, compared with cells in situ. The increased fluctuation seemed in part due to greater tension within the expanding sheet in vitro, since when tension was reduced, for example by wounding, the cells spread with less fluctuation and at a greater rate (6.5 micrometers/min compared with 0.77 micrometers/min). Micromanipulation showed that cells adhered to the substratum, both in situ and in vitro, by a broad contact where transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of sectioned material showed the cells to be less than 30 nm from the substratum. A similar separation was observed beneath cells in vitro when viewed in life with interference-reflexion optics (IRM). A few focal contacts (adhesion plaques) were also seen with IRM and TEM of cells in vitro, but were not seen with TEM of cells in situ. Submarginal as well as marginal basal cells of the advancing sheet adhere and spread on the substratum in both situations, whereas cells of the outer layer are passive. Hence, the overall pattern of migration of these cells is similar in vitro and in situ; the differences in rates of movement may be explained in part by the different degree of tension in the epithelium under the 2 conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Kozlov and A. Mogilner Model of Polarization and Bistability of Cell Fragments Biophys. J., December 1, 2007; 93(11): 3811 - 3819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Farooqui and G. Fenteany Multiple rows of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic lamellipodia to collectively drive cell-sheet movement J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2005; 118(1): 51 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Ream, J. A. Theriot, and G. N. Somero Influences of thermal acclimation and acute temperature change on the motility of epithelial wound-healing cells (keratocytes) of tropical, temperate and Antarctic fish J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2003; 206(24): 4539 - 4551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Lee and K Jacobson The composition and dynamics of cell-substratum adhesions in locomoting fish keratocytes J. Cell Sci., January 11, 1997; 110(22): 2833 - 2844. [Abstract] [PDF]