spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, E. J.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 44, Issue 1 225-242, Copyright © 1980 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The effect of fibronectin and substratum-attached material on the spreading of chick embryo mesoderm cells in vitro

EJ Sanders

Endoblast and hypoblast tissue, dissected from early chick embryos, was explanted and cultured on glass or plastic substrata. These tissues grew rapidly to form epithelial sheets. Under the same conditions, mesoderm, dissected without the aid of dissociating agents, grew poorly. After 24 h in culture, the mesoderm explants consisted of a sparse outgrowth of fibroblast-like cells. When pieces of mesoderm were seeded onto the dorsal surface of the epithelia, however, the cells penetrated the sheet and rapidly spread on the substratum within 4 h. If the epithelial sheet was detached from the substratum and the mesoderm then seeded onto areas of substratum previously occupied by epithelium, similar rapid spreading occurred. This effect could be produced in the absence of serum. The method used to remove the epithelium (EDTA, detergent or manual dissection) did not influence the result. When the substratum-attached material (SAM) was examined by scanning electron microscopy, 2 types of material were seen. One type appeared to be the remains of detached filopodia and cytoplasmic lamellae, while the other appeared to be of extracellular origin. Both these types reacted positively by immunofluorescence using anti-fibronectin serum. SAM derived from mesoderm reacted negatively. When mesoderm was cultured in the presence of plasma fibronectin on unmodified plastic or glass, spreading was complete in 4-5 h and thus was similar to mesoderm seeded onto SAM. The morphology of mesoderm explants on SAM or in the presence of plasma fibronectin was more epithelial than on untreated substratum in normal medium. Hypoblast and endoblast cultured in the presence of anti-fibronectin serum failed to spread normally, apparently being unable to attach to the substratum. Mesoderm did not spread rapidly on SAM in the presence of this antiserum. Cycloheximide reversibly inhibited the spreading of hypoblast and endoblast, and this effect could be eliminated, at least for hypoblast, by the addition of plasma fibronectin. Covering attachment sites on the substratum with bovine serum albumin, thereby preventing the attachment of SAM or fibronectin, also inhibited spreading. It is proposed that mesoderm cells have low levels of surface fibronectin in comparison with endoblast and hypoblast, and that this results in a comparatively low adhesiveness, which is important for its morphogenetic activity within the embryo.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1980