|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 52, Issue 1 1-10, Copyright © 1981 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
G Gerisch and HU Keller
Human granulocytes were stimulated by means of a micropipette, with an orifice of about 0.2 micrometer in diameter, which contained fMet-Leu-Phe at a concentration of 10(-5) M. The cells were reorientated by extending lamellipodia towards the source of the attractant, often within less than 10 s. Any part of the granulocyte, from the front to the tip of the tail, could be stimulated to produce new lamellipodia. Usually, but not always, this response occurred at the side of the cell nearest to the micropipette. Cells stimulated from behind responded in one of the following ways: (1) Cells that maintained their polarity extended new lamellipodia at one side of the leading front and reorientated by moving in a U-turn towards the micropipette. Occasionally, the leading front was split because one part of the front tried to make a left-hand and the other a right-hand turn. (2) Formation of lamellipodia at the leading front was arrested and new lamellipodia were formed at the tail instead, indicating reversal of polarity. The result was an immediate change in the direction of locomotion by about 180 degrees. (3) A combination of the first 2 forms of behaviour was observed occasionally. Transiently, lamellipodia were extended from cell surface areas both close to and distant from the micropipette. These observations show that parts of a cell can respond independently to chemotactic gradients by extending lamellipodia towards the source of the attractant. The phenomenon can easily be explained by assuming that a temporal change of attractant concentration is recognized.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Mseka, J. R. Bamburg, and L. P. Cramer ADF/cofilin family proteins control formation of oriented actin-filament bundles in the cell body to trigger fibroblast polarization J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2007; 120(24): 4332 - 4344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. P. Somesh, G. Vlahou, M. Iijima, R. H. Insall, P. Devreotes, and F. Rivero RacG Regulates Morphology, Phagocytosis, and Chemotaxis Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1648 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Diez, G. Gerisch, K. Anderson, A. Muller-Taubenberger, and T. Bretschneider Subsecond reorganization of the actin network in cell motility and chemotaxis PNAS, May 24, 2005; 102(21): 7601 - 7606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Noegel, R. Blau-Wasser, H. Sultana, R. Muller, L. Israel, M. Schleicher, H. Patel, and C. J. Weijer The Cyclase-associated Protein CAP as Regulator of Cell Polarity and cAMP Signaling in Dictyostelium Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2004; 15(2): 934 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V.-M. Loitto, B. Rasmusson, and K.-E. Magnusson Assessment of neutrophil N-formyl peptide receptors by using antibodies and fluorescent peptides J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 69(5): 762 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Konzok, I. Weber, E. Simmeth, U. Hacker, M. Maniak, and A. Muller-Taubenberger Daip1, a Dictyostelium Homologue of the Yeast Actin-Interacting Protein 1, Is Involved in Endocytosis, Cytokinesis, and Motility J. Cell Biol., July 26, 1999; 146(2): 453 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Servant, O. D. Weiner, E. R. Neptune, J. W. Sedat, and H. R. Bourne Dynamics of a Chemoattractant Receptor in Living Neutrophils during Chemotaxis Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 1999; 10(4): 1163 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Albrecht and H. R. Petty Cellular memory: Neutrophil orientation reverses during temporally decreasing chemoattractant concentrations PNAS, April 28, 1998; 95(9): 5039 - 5044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Xiao, N. Zhang, D. B. Murphy, and P. N. Devreotes Dynamic Distribution of Chemoattractant Receptors in Living Cells During Chemotaxis and Persistent Stimulation J. Cell Biol., October 20, 1997; 139(2): 365 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Niewohner, I. Weber, M. Maniak, A. Muller-Taubenberger, and G. Gerisch Talin-Null Cells of Dictyostelium Are Strongly Defective in Adhesion to Particle and Substrate Surfaces and Slightly Impaired in Cytokinesis J. Cell Biol., July 28, 1997; 138(2): 349 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Rivero, B Koppel, B Peracino, S Bozzaro, F Siegert, C. Weijer, M Schleicher, R Albrecht, and A. Noegel The role of the cortical cytoskeleton: F-actin crosslinking proteins protect against osmotic stress, ensure cell size, cell shape and motility, and contribute to phagocytosis and development J. Cell Sci., January 11, 1996; 109(11): 2679 - 2691. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Weber, E Wallraff, R Albrecht, and G Gerisch Motility and substratum adhesion of Dictyostelium wild-type and cytoskeletal mutant cells: a study by RICM/bright-field double-view image analysis J. Cell Sci., January 4, 1995; 108(4): 1519 - 1530. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Appeddu and B. Shur Control of stable lamellipodia formation by expression of cell surface beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase cytoplasmic domains J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1994; 107(9): 2535 - 2545. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Vicker The regulation of chemotaxis and chemokinesis in Dictyostelium amoebae by temporal signals and spatial gradients of cyclic AMP J. Cell Sci., January 2, 1994; 107(2): 659 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y Zaffran, H Lepidi, P Bongrand, J. Mege, and C Capo F-actin content and spatial distribution in resting and chemoattractant-stimulated human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Which role for intracellular free calcium? J. Cell Sci., January 7, 1993; 105(3): 675 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
