spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassiman, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by van den Berghe, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cassiman, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by van den Berghe, H.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 54, Issue 1 79-95, Copyright © 1982 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Qualitative and quantitative differences in spreading of human fibroblasts on various protein coats. Modulation by treatment of the cells with amines

JJ Cassiman, B van der Schueren, F van Leuven and H van den Berghe

In contrast to established cell lines, normal human skin fibroblasts spread on their own fibronectin. The present investigation has examined whether human fibroblasts, like established cell lines, would be capable of spreading on substrata coated with proteins with different reactivity towards the cell surface. Coverslips were coated with human serum, fibronectin, alpha 2 macroglobulin-trypsin, a polyspecific anti-fibroblast antibody and a polyspecific anti-calf-serum antibody. The attachment of the cells to these substrate was of the same extent. Spreading was examined qualitatively using phase, interference contrast and reflection contrast optics on live cells, as well as scanning electron microscopy on fixed cells. To quantitate the maximum degree of cell spreading a semi-automated system was used, which measured the cell perimeter on a large number of cells. The distributions of the degree of cell spreading on the five substrata were compared statistically. The qualitative and quantitative differences observed on the various substrata could be further differentiated by adding various amines to the cells during 60 min spreading or during a 30 min preincubation before spreading. No strict correlation could be found between the effect of the amines on attachment or on spreading and their presumed effects on cellular transglutaminases. The results clearly indicate that the spreading of human fibroblasts can be modulated by the nature of the substratum and that, by using quantitative methods, these differences in behaviour can be measured accurately.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1982