spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donath, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gingell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donath, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gingell, D.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 63, Issue 1 113-124, Copyright © 1983 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

A sharp cell surface conformational transition at low ionic strength changes the nature of the adhesion of enzyme-treated red blood cells to a hydrocarbon interface

E Donath and D Gingell

Aldehyde-fixed human red cells have previously been used to assess the roles of electrostatic and electrodynamic forces in adhesion. We have attempted to test the prediction that enzymic removal of cell surface negative charges should increase adhesion in dilute salt solutions by reducing electrostatic repulsion. While this is indeed the case for neuraminidase-treated cells and also for Pronase- and trypsin-treated cells over much of the low ionic strength range, the latter two treatments cause very strong adhesion over a remarkably narrow range of ionic strength centred on 1 mM-NaCl. At 0.5 and 1.5 mM adhesion is negligible. After Pronase treatment a further adhesive peak occurs at 2.5 mM. Electrophoresis of protease-treated cells shows small but clear reductions in mobility at precisely these peak adhesion values. These electrophoretic potential changes are almost certainly not large enough to cause increased adhesion directly, and it is thought that they are second-order changes, symptomatic of a structural rearrangement of the cell surface. How this causes such vastly augmented adhesion is an intriguing problem.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1983