spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lackie, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lackie, A. M.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 63, Issue 1 181-190, Copyright © 1983 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Effect of substratum wettability and charge on adhesion in vitro and encapsulation in vivo by insect haemocytes

AM Lackie

The circulating leucocytes of insects, the haemocytes, adhere to and encapsulate foreign material that enters the insect's body cavity. The thickness of the capsule depends not only on the insect species but also on the nature of the object concerned, a fact that is of great importance to invading parasites and pathogens. In this paper, some of the factors that may stimulate haemocyte adhesion and subsequent encapsulation of the object have been investigated using abiotic materials with surfaces of different charge and wettability. The negativity and wettability of surfaces of polystyrene beads and plates can be increased by pretreatment with acid, and adhesion of haemocytes to these modified surfaces has been examined in vivo and in vitro. A similar proportion of haemocytes of the locust Schistocerca gregaria adhere to the plates in vitro, irrespective of the changes in charge and wettability, but the adhesion of haemocytes of the cockroach Periplaneta americana is proportional to the increases in both parameters. These differences in cell behaviour are reflected in vivo: cockroach haemocytes form thicker capsules around more hydrophilic and more negatively charged polystyrene beads, while locust cells encapsulate both types of surface to the same, minimal, degree. Positively and negatively charged Sepharose beads are encapsulated more thickly than are neutral beads in cockroaches; negatively charged Sepharose beads are not encapsulated at all in locusts. There are thus obvious differences between the two species in the ways in which their haemocytes respond to these modified abiotic surfaces. It is suggested that capsule thickness in vivo depends on the initial cell-substratum contact; different surfaces stimulate the cell to different extents, which in turn causes variations in the recruitment of other cells to the capsule.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Wang and R. J. St. Leger
A collagenous protective coat enables Metarhizium anisopliae to evade insect immune responses
PNAS, April 25, 2006; 103(17): 6647 - 6652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. C. Wootton, E. A. Dyrynda, and N. A. Ratcliffe
Interaction between non-specific electrostatic forces and humoral factors in haemocyte attachment and encapsulation in the edible cockle, Cerastoderma edule
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2006; 209(7): 1326 - 1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1983