spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heslop-Harrison, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heslop-Harrison, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, M. D.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 64, Issue 1 163-177, Copyright © 1983 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The positions of centromeres on the somatic metaphase plate of grasses

JS Heslop-Harrison and MD Bennett

Centromere positions on the metaphase plate of 48 root-tip cells of four grass species were analysed using metaphases reconstructed from electron micrographs of serial thin sections. Centromere alignment was almost perfect on a plane in 15 untreated metaphases of cereals where 2n = 14; only 2% of the total variance in centromere position was out of the plane of the metaphase plate. In 23 similar cells pretreated with ice-water, the mean out-of-plate variance was 9%, compared to an expectation of 18% if centromeres were positioned randomly in space. In cold-treated cells of Zea mays (2n = 20), the out-of-plate variance (14%) was significantly less than a random expectation of 20%. The distances of centromeres from the mean centromere position (MCP) were also analysed. They showed that the centromeres tended to be normally distributed about a circle around the MCP in all the species. Thus centromeres tend towards a ring arrangement in metaphase cells. Analysis of separation distances of all pairs of centromeres in each reconstructed cell showed that the distribution of distances between centromeres is not random: there are significantly fewer centromeres that are close together and more that are at medium separation distances than is expected on a random basis. This is different from previously published assumptions about centromere disposition in squashed metaphases.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1983